Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

In Vivo Mouse Model of Spinal Implant Infection
Published on: June 23, 2020
Intraoperative Antibiotic Use in Patients With Early-onset Scoliosis: Current Practices and Trends
Millis Faust1, Sachin Allahabadi2,3, Craig Louer4
1University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine.
Insights
Antibiotic prophylaxis practices for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) surgery showed variability even after guideline publication. However, gram-negative coverage increased post-guidelines, with no significant change in surgical site infection rates.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Infectious Disease Prevention
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) for antibiotic prophylaxis in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) were published in September 2019.
- Recommendations included specific intravenous and topical antibiotics, with additional gram-negative coverage for neuromuscular cases.
- Current adherence to these BPGs and practice patterns remain largely uncharacterized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze antibiotic prophylaxis strategies employed during index growth-friendly procedures for EOS.
- To assess the impact of the 2019 BPGs on antibiotic prophylaxis practices.
- To evaluate changes in antibiotic use patterns over time.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 562 EOS patients undergoing index growth-friendly procedures (January 2018-March 2021).
- Data collected included patient demographics, procedure types, intraoperative antibiotics, and 90-day complications.
- Antibiotic use was compared between pre-BPG (April 2018-September 2019) and post-BPG (October 2019-March 2021) periods.
Main Results:
- Cefazolin was the most common agent, used alone or with an aminoglycoside.
- Topical vancomycin was utilized in over half of the patients.
- Post-BPG publication, there was a significant increase in the use of cefazolin with an aminoglycoside (16% vs. 25%, P=0.01).
- Surgical site infections occurred in 2.1% of patients, with no significant difference based on antibiotic regimen.
Conclusions:
- Significant variability in antibiotic prophylaxis for EOS growth-friendly procedures persists.
- The 2019 BPGs correlated with increased gram-negative antibiotic coverage.
- Further efforts are needed to standardize practices, enhance guideline compliance, and confirm BPG efficacy.
Background:
Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients were published in September 2019. Recommendations included using intravenous cefazolin and topical vancomycin for all index procedures, plus gram-negative coverage for neuromuscular patients. Guideline adherence is unknown. This study aimed to characterize antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of index growth-friendly procedures and assess changes in practice patterns over time.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective review of data collected through a multicenter study group included EOS patients undergoing index growth-friendly procedures between January 2018 and March 2021, excluding revisions, lengthenings, and tetherings. Demographics, clinical measurements, intraoperative antibiotics, and 90-day complications were recorded. Descriptive and univariate statistics were utilized. Antibiotic prophylaxis from April 2018 through September 2019 and October 2019 through March 2021 were compared with evaluate change after BPG publication.
Results:
A total of 562 patients undergoing growth-friendly procedures were included. The most common scoliosis types included neuromuscular (167, 29.7%), syndromic (134, 23.8%), and congenital (97, 17.3%). Most index procedures involved magnetically controlled growing rods (417, 74%) followed by vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib or traditional growing rods (105, 19%). Most patients received cefazolin alone at index procedure (310, 55.2%) or cefazolin with an aminoglycoside (113, 20.1%). Topical antibiotics were used in 327 patients (58.2%), with most receiving vancomycin powder. There was increased use of cefazolin with an aminoglycoside after BPG publication (16% vs. 25%) ( P =0.01). Surgical site infections occurred in 12 patients (2.1%) within 90 days of index procedure, 10 pre-BPGs (3%), and 2 post-BPGs (0.9%), with no significant difference in surgical site infection rate by type of antibiotic administered ( P >0.05).
Conclusions:
Historical variability exists regarding antibiotic prophylaxis during index growth-friendly procedures for EOS. There continues to be variability following BPG publication; however, this study found a significant increase in antibiotic prophylaxis against gram-negative bacteria after BPG publication. Overall, greater emphasis is needed to decrease variability in practice, improve compliance with consensus guidelines, and evaluate BPG efficacy.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III-retrospective.
More Related Videos
03:47A Retrospective Study on Endoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Paravertebral Abscess in Spinal Tuberculosis Patients
Published on: October 25, 2024
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Antibiotic Selection