Infarct-Related Artery as a Donor of Collaterals in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Concomitant

Matthias Scholz1,2, Thomas Meyer3,2, Lars S Maier4

  • 1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany.

Insights

In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a non-infarct-related artery, collaterals from the infarct-related artery distal to the occlusion improve prognosis. This finding challenges the double-jeopardy theory.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Myocardial Infarction Research

Background:

  • Concomitant chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a non-infarct-related artery (NIRA) is linked to adverse outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
  • The "double-jeopardy effect" describes the acute threat to both the infarct-related artery (IRA) and the CTO area when the IRA provides collaterals to the CTO.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the prognostic significance of intercoronary collateral origins (IRA vs. NIRA) in STEMI patients with coexisting NIRA CTO.
  • To evaluate the impact of collateral supply from the IRA proximal versus distal to the STEMI occlusion on patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from 93 STEMI patients with single-vessel CTO in a NIRA and well-developed collaterals from a prospective study (FITT-STEMI).
  • Comparison of in-hospital mortality rates based on the origin of collaterals supplying the CTO (NIRA, IRA proximal, IRA distal).
  • Multivariate regression analysis to identify independent predictors of mortality.

Main Results:

  • In-hospital mortality varied significantly based on collateral origin: 15.2% (NIRA), 29.4% (IRA proximal), and 3.3% (IRA distal).
  • A proximal collateral origin from the IRA was associated with significantly higher mortality compared to a distal origin (OR=20.8, P=0.027).

Conclusions:

  • In STEMI patients with NIRA CTO, collateralization from the IRA distal to the acute occlusion is associated with a better prognosis.
  • These findings suggest that the double-jeopardy effect may not be the primary driver of adverse outcomes in this patient population.