Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The blood metabolome of brain health in midlife and influences of genes, microbiome and exposome.

Nature aging·2026
Same author

Vision-Capable LLMs in Microsurgery: A Blinded Comparison of Two AI Models with Expert Microsurgeons in the Appraisal of 200 Experimental Anastomoses.

Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

European Reference Networks - a flagship activity of the EU in the field of rare and complex diseases: from 2017 to 2025.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2026
Same author

Microvascular errors of technique: a systematic review.

Acta neurochirurgica·2026
Same author

Using facial morphology traits related to attention problems in children to identify prenatal exposure history - CORRIGENDUM.

Journal of developmental origins of health and disease·2026
Same author

Proteogenomics in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma reveals new biological fingerprint of cerebral small vessel disease.

Nature aging·2025
Same journal

Building Practical Artificial Intelligence Tools For The Plastic Surgeon: A Step-By-Step Guide To Cowork.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Interpretation Matters: Common Statistical Pitfalls in Retrospective Surgical Research.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

"Inferior Repositioning of the High-Riding Nipple Using a Parenchymal-Based Flap".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

A Four-Step Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Rhytids: A Focus on Upper Facial Wrinkles.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Long-Term Retention of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage Allograft in An Animal Model.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Manual extrusion of fat granules for primary thinning of a bulky flap.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
08:18

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Published on: May 16, 2025

286

Sagittal Craniosynostosis: Comparing Surgical Techniques Using 3D Photogrammetry.

Tareq Abdel-Alim1,2, Melissa Kurniawan3, Irene Mathijssen3

  • 1From the Departments of Neurosurgery.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|March 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Three surgical methods for sagittal synostosis show similar outcomes by age 6. Early diagnosis is key for effective minimally invasive surgery, improving cranial shape and growth.

More Related Videos

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.5K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
08:18

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Published on: May 16, 2025

286
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.5K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Craniofacial surgery
  • Pediatric neurosurgery
  • Medical imaging

Background:

  • Sagittal synostosis is a premature fusion of the skull's sagittal suture.
  • Surgical correction aims to normalize cranial shape and prevent complications.
  • Three common surgical interventions include frontobiparietal remodeling (FBR), extended strip craniotomy (ESC), and spring-assisted correction (SAC).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of FBR, ESC, and SAC in correcting sagittal synostosis.
  • To evaluate surgical outcomes using three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry and operational characteristics.
  • To assess long-term cranial growth and shape normalization post-surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Inclusion of 218 patients diagnosed with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis (1991-2019).
  • Utilized postoperative 3D photogrammetry images up to age 6 for analysis.
  • Extracted 3D photocephalometric measurements and cranial slices to assess growth and shape.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in 3D photocephalometric measurements were found among FBR, ESC, and SAC groups.
  • Postoperative cranial growth and shape generally normalized, irrespective of surgical technique.
  • Persistent flattening of the vertex was observed in some cases post-correction.

Conclusions:

  • FBR, ESC, and SAC demonstrate comparable efficacy in correcting sagittal synostosis by age 6.
  • Early diagnosis is crucial to facilitate minimally invasive surgical options.
  • The study's 3D mesh processing tool is publicly available for research use.