Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Kim N Chi1, Dana Rathkopf2, Matthew R Smith3

  • 1BC Cancer - Vancouver Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Insights

Niraparib plus abiraterone acetate significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and homologous recombination repair alterations. This combination offers a new treatment option for HRR+ mCRPC.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a lethal disease with limited treatment options.
  • Homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations, such as BRCA1/2, can make cancer cells sensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.
  • Combining poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition with androgen receptor signaling inhibition may improve outcomes in treatment-naïve mCRPC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (niraparib + AAP) versus placebo plus AAP in patients with mCRPC.
  • To assess the impact of HRR-associated gene alterations on treatment outcomes.
  • To determine the primary endpoint of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in specific patient subgroups.

Main Methods:

  • The MAGNITUDE study was a phase III, randomized, double-blinded trial (NCT03748641).
  • Patients were assigned to receive either niraparib + AAP or placebo + AAP (1:1 ratio).
  • Patients were stratified based on the presence (HRR+, n=423) or absence (HRR-, n=247) of HRR-associated gene alterations, prospectively determined by tissue/plasma assays.

Main Results:

  • In the BRCA1/2 subgroup, median rPFS was significantly longer with niraparib + AAP (16.6 months) versus placebo + AAP (10.9 months; HR, 0.53; P=.001).
  • In the overall HRR+ cohort, median rPFS was significantly longer with niraparib + AAP (16.5 months) versus placebo + AAP (13.7 months; HR, 0.73; P=.022).
  • Secondary endpoints, including time to symptomatic progression and time to chemotherapy initiation, also showed improvement. Futility was declared in the HRR- cohort. Treatment was tolerable, with anemia and hypertension as common grade ≥3 adverse events.

Conclusions:

  • Combination treatment with niraparib + AAP significantly improved rPFS in patients with HRR+ mCRPC compared to standard-of-care AAP.
  • Niraparib + AAP demonstrates a significant benefit for patients with HRR alterations in mCRPC.
  • The combination therapy is a tolerable and effective option for this patient population.

Related Concept Videos

Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
7.7K
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.4K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.0K
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists01:28

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists

Neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors are distributed across the GI tract, vagal afferents, and key CNS regions including the central vomiting center and chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) Chemotherapy agents stimulate enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to release large amounts of substance P (SP). SP is a neuropeptide released by specific sensory nerves in response to many different stressors, including those in the GI mucosa affected by chemotherapy.  SP binds and activates...
216