Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Kim N Chi1, Dana Rathkopf2, Matthew R Smith3
1BC Cancer - Vancouver Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Purpose:
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a lethal disease with current standard-of-care therapies. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations, including BRCA1/2 alterations, can sensitize cancer cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition, which may improve outcomes in treatment-naïve mCRPC when combined with androgen receptor signaling inhibition.
Methods:
MAGNITUDE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03748641) is a phase III, randomized, double-blinded study that evaluates niraparib and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (niraparib + AAP) in patients with (HRR+, n = 423) or without (HRR-, n = 247) HRR-associated gene alterations, as prospectively determined by tissue/plasma-based assays. Patients were assigned 1:1 to receive niraparib + AAP or placebo + AAP. The primary end point, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) assessed by central review, was evaluated first in the BRCA1/2 subgroup and then in the full HRR+ cohort, with secondary end points analyzed for the full HRR+ cohort if rPFS was statistically significant. A futility analysis was preplanned in the HRR- cohort.
Results:
Median rPFS in the BRCA1/2 subgroup was significantly longer in the niraparib + AAP group compared with the placebo + AAP group (16.6 v 10.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.79; P = .001). In the overall HRR+ cohort, rPFS was significantly longer in the niraparib + AAP group compared with the placebo + AAP group (16.5 v 13.7 months; HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.96; P = .022). These findings were supported by improvement in the secondary end points of time to symptomatic progression and time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the HRR- cohort, futility was declared per the prespecified criteria. Treatment with niraparib + AAP was tolerable, with anemia and hypertension as the most reported grade ≥ 3 adverse events.
Conclusion:
Combination treatment with niraparib + AAP significantly lengthened rPFS in patients with HRR+ mCRPC compared with standard-of-care AAP.
Abstract:
[Media: see text].
Insights
Niraparib plus abiraterone acetate significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and homologous recombination repair alterations. This combination offers a new treatment option for HRR+ mCRPC.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a lethal disease with limited treatment options.
- Homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations, such as BRCA1/2, can make cancer cells sensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.
- Combining poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition with androgen receptor signaling inhibition may improve outcomes in treatment-naïve mCRPC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (niraparib + AAP) versus placebo plus AAP in patients with mCRPC.
- To assess the impact of HRR-associated gene alterations on treatment outcomes.
- To determine the primary endpoint of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in specific patient subgroups.
Main Methods:
- The MAGNITUDE study was a phase III, randomized, double-blinded trial (NCT03748641).
- Patients were assigned to receive either niraparib + AAP or placebo + AAP (1:1 ratio).
- Patients were stratified based on the presence (HRR+, n=423) or absence (HRR-, n=247) of HRR-associated gene alterations, prospectively determined by tissue/plasma assays.
Main Results:
- In the BRCA1/2 subgroup, median rPFS was significantly longer with niraparib + AAP (16.6 months) versus placebo + AAP (10.9 months; HR, 0.53; P=.001).
- In the overall HRR+ cohort, median rPFS was significantly longer with niraparib + AAP (16.5 months) versus placebo + AAP (13.7 months; HR, 0.73; P=.022).
- Secondary endpoints, including time to symptomatic progression and time to chemotherapy initiation, also showed improvement. Futility was declared in the HRR- cohort. Treatment was tolerable, with anemia and hypertension as common grade ≥3 adverse events.
Conclusions:
- Combination treatment with niraparib + AAP significantly improved rPFS in patients with HRR+ mCRPC compared to standard-of-care AAP.
- Niraparib + AAP demonstrates a significant benefit for patients with HRR alterations in mCRPC.
- The combination therapy is a tolerable and effective option for this patient population.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists

