Diffuse sclerosing variant papillary thyroid carcinoma has worse survival than classic papillary thyroid carcinoma: a
Henry Crayton1,2, Katherine Wu3, David Leong1
1Department of Endocrine Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract:
Diffuse sclerosing variant (DSV) of papillary thyroid carcinomais a rare form of thyroid cancer that demonstrates more aggressive histopathology than classical papillary thyroid carcinoma (c-PTC); however, if this leads to worse survival is debated. Many DSVs are driven by fusion events which are of recent clinical importance due to the advent of targeted RET inhibitors. A systematic search and meta-analysis of the literature was performed to compare outcomes of disease-specific mortality (DSM), metastatic and recurrent disease and the incidence of fusion events between DSV and c-PTC to July 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment studies was used to assess quality. An odds ratio (OR) was utilised to measure outcomes with 95% CIs. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guideline was followed. Seventeen studies were included with 874 DSV patients compared to 76,013 c-PTC patients. DSV patients had worse DSM (OR=2.50, 95% CI 1.39-4.51) and presented with a higher rate of metastatic lymph nodes (OR = 5.85, 95% CI 2.73-12.53) and more distant metastases (OR = 3.83, 95% CI 2.17-6.77). DSV patients had higher odds of recurrent disease (OR = 3.23, 95% CI 2.00-5.23) and overall distant metastasis (OR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.74-4.17). Rates of RET fusion alterations for DSV ranged from 25 to 83%. DSV has a worse prognosis than c-PTC with higher rates of recurrent disease and distant metastasis. The high prevalence of RET fusions offers the potential to improve outcomes for patients with DSV.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach


