Deplatforming did not decrease Parler users' activity on fringe social media
Manoel Horta Ribeiro1, Homa Hosseinmardi2, Robert West1
1School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Philadelphia, Switzerland.
PNAS Nexus
|March 24, 2023
Summary
Deplatforming fringe social media platforms like Parler did not reduce overall user activity. Instead, other fringe platforms like Gab and Rumble saw increased engagement after Parler was removed.
Area of Science:
- Social Media Studies
- Digital Sociology
- Platform Governance
Background:
- Online platforms increasingly ban harmful content and users.
- The effectiveness of deplatforming is questioned as users often migrate to alternative sites.
- Parler, a fringe social media platform, was deplatformed following the US Capitol riot.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of deplatforming Parler on user activity.
- To determine if deplatforming reduces overall engagement on fringe social media.
- To analyze user migration patterns to alternative fringe platforms.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal analysis of user activity across mainstream and fringe social media platforms (N = 112,705).
- Difference-in-differences analysis to establish causal effects on active Parler users (N = 996).
- Tracking user-level activity on desktop and mobile devices before and after deplatforming.
Main Results:
- Fringe platforms such as Gab and Rumble experienced growth after Parler's deplatforming.
- Overall activity on fringe social media increased while Parler was offline.
- Deplatforming Parler increased daily activity on other fringe platforms by 10.9-15.9 percentage points.
Conclusions:
- The isolated deplatforming of a major fringe social media platform was ineffective in reducing overall fringe social media engagement.
- User activity shifted to alternative fringe platforms rather than decreasing.
- Platform governance strategies need to consider user migration and the resilience of fringe online communities.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
34.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.4K
Deindividuation
26.5K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.5K
Leaving Groups
7.9K
The nature of leaving groups strongly influences the outcome of a nucleophilic substitution reaction.
In general, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, a nucleophile displaces a functional group, called the leaving group, from the substrate to give a substituted product. A leaving group departs the substrate molecule through heterolytic cleavage, taking the pair of electrons with it to become a relatively stable weak base in the form of an anion or a neutral molecule.
In a...
In general, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, a nucleophile displaces a functional group, called the leaving group, from the substrate to give a substituted product. A leaving group departs the substrate molecule through heterolytic cleavage, taking the pair of electrons with it to become a relatively stable weak base in the form of an anion or a neutral molecule.
In a...
7.9K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Social Exchange Theory
34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K


