Exclusion by design: The undocumented 1.5 generation in the U.S
1Department of Anthropology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Frontiers in Sociology
|March 24, 2023
Summary
This study examines undocumented Mexican immigrants in the U.S. (1.5 generation) excluded from Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). It explores barriers to DACA and the lived experiences of those without this crucial immigration relief.
Area of Science:
- Sociology
- Immigration Studies
- Public Policy
Background:
- Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) provided relief for some undocumented youth.
- Many undocumented individuals, particularly the 1.5 generation, were excluded from DACA's benefits.
- Existing research has largely focused on DACA recipients, overlooking those ineligible or unable to renew.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the experiences of undocumented Mexican immigrants who did not benefit from DACA.
- To understand the reasons for DACA ineligibility or non-application among the 1.5 generation.
- To analyze the impacts of government policy exclusion on vulnerable populations.
Main Methods:
- Ethnographic methodologies.
- One-on-one interviews with 20 individuals without DACA.
- Comparative analysis with 20 DACA beneficiaries.
Main Results:
- Identified barriers to DACA application and renewal, including restrictive eligibility criteria.
- Examined the lived realities and perceptions of those excluded from DACA.
- Highlighted how DACA functioned as an internal border of exclusion for many.
Conclusions:
- The study fills a critical gap in immigration research by focusing on those outside DACA.
- Findings underscore the vulnerability of populations excluded from government programs.
- Understanding these experiences is crucial for policy development and support for immigrant communities.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.3K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.3K
Gene Flow
35.3K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
35.3K
Genetic Drift
40.2K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
40.2K
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
34.8K
Diploid organisms inherit genetic material through chromosomes from both parents. Copies of the same gene are known as alleles. In most cases, both alleles are simultaneously expressed and allow various cellular processes to function optimally. If one of the alleles is missing or mutated, the expression of the other allele can compensate; however, this is not true for all genes.
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
34.8K
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
1.4K
The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:
1.4K
Law of Segregation
66.3K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
66.3K


