Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Placenta-Targeted Drug Delivery Using Three Complementary Methods
Published on: September 10, 2018
Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy: a VAERS based analysis
Greta Santi Laurini1, Nicola Montanaro2, Domenico Motola3
1Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Insights
COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant individuals is recommended. This study analyzed Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data from December 2020 to April 2022, finding most adverse events were non-serious, supporting maternal immunization safety.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Public Health
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
Background:
- COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for pregnant individuals.
- Evidence on vaccine safety during pregnancy is crucial for informed clinical decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide further evidence on the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines administered during pregnancy.
- To support clinicians in recommending maternal immunization.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) in pregnant individuals.
- Data retrieved from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) between December 2020 and April 2022.
Main Results:
- 4,869 reports of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women were submitted to VAERS.
- Most adverse events (80.43%) were non-serious, with headache, fatigue, and pyrexia being most common.
- mRNA vaccines (mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2) were most frequently reported; spontaneous abortion and vaginal hemorrhage had the highest reporting rates among pregnancy-related outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Post-marketing surveillance of VAERS data provides updated evidence on COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnancy.
- Findings support the recommendation of maternal immunization against COVID-19.
Purpose:
Since vaccination against COVID-19 is recommended in pregnant people, we aimed to provide further evidence on the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy.
Methods:
Data on COVID-19 vaccines adverse events following immunizations (AEFIs) in pregnant people were retrieved from the open-access Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from December 2020 to April 2022.
Results:
From December 2020 to April 1, 2022, a total of 4,869 reports involving pregnant women at COVID-19 vaccination were reported to VAERS. Among vaccines recipients, most belonged to the age group between 30 and 39 years old (3,029; 62.21%) and nearly half experienced an adverse event within 48 h of immunization (2,344; 48.14%). Overall, 21,816 suspected adverse reactions associated with COVID-19 vaccines were reported, and for as many as 80.43% of patients, they were described as non-serious. Most reactions occurred after administration of the mRNA-1273 (53.34%) and the BNT162b2 (40.68%) vaccines, while only a small proportion were related to the Johnson & Johnson's vaccine (5.69%). The most common non-pregnancy specific adverse events were headache (482; 2.21%), fatigue (472; 2.16%), and pyrexia (436; 2.00%), while adverse pregnancy outcomes with the highest reporting rate were abortions spontaneous (762; 3.49%), and vaginal haemorrhage (229; 1.05%).
Conclusion:
This post-marketing survey on VAERS data have provided updated evidence on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy, thus supporting clinicians in recommending maternal immunization.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Vaccinations
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

