Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Working together: reflections on how to make public involvement in research work.
Lynn McVey1,2, Tina Frost1,2, Basma Issa1,2
1Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Public and professional researchers collaborated on falls prevention research, enhancing patient relevance and outcomes. Effective collaboration requires addressing emotional impacts, power dynamics, and fostering mutual trust for successful public involvement in research.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Patient and Public Involvement
- Gerontology
Background:
- Growing recognition of public involvement in research development, implementation, and dissemination.
- This paper details a collaborative research study on falls prevention in older patients within English acute hospitals.
- Focus on valuing all contributions, aligning with UK standards for public involvement in health and social care research.
Discussion:
- The study was co-authored by lay and professional researchers, using empirical evidence and reflective statements for evaluation.
- Explores the extent to which patient and public perspectives were integrated into the research process.
- Highlights the co-authoring process as a method for end-of-project evaluation.
Key Insights:
- Lay involvement positively impacted the project by focusing on patient-centered priorities and improving data analysis quality.
- Lay contributors felt their personal experiences were honored, enhancing research relevance.
- Challenges included lay individuals feeling overwhelmed by systemic change requirements, potentially questioning their involvement rationale.
Outlook:
- Practical recommendations for effective research collaboration are provided.
- Emphasizes discussing and supporting lay researchers through potential emotional impacts during recruitment and throughout projects.
- Addresses power imbalances, practical challenges, and facilitating group processes, particularly building mutual trust.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Naturalistic Observations
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Archival Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...