Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Characterization and potential influence of laboratory airborne particle fallout on microplastics analysis.

Journal of hazardous materials·2025

Same author

Spatial and Temporal Trends of Dissolved Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers and Non-BDE Flame Retardants in the Aquatic Environment across Countries.

Environmental science & technology·2025

Same author

Postprocessing methods based on minimum detectable amount and method blank for data reporting of particle count and refining estimation of matrix spike recovery in environmental microplastics analysis.

Chemosphere·2025

Same author

Evaluation of multilayer co-extrusion film and other three plastic membranes as passive samplers for determination of polyhalogenated carbazoles in water.

Water research·2025

Same author

Microplastic pollution in the water column and benthic sediment of the San Pedro Bay, California, USA.

Environmental research·2025

Same author

Principles of passive sampling for ex situ measurement of hydrophobic organic compounds in sediment: Key considerations on dilution, depletion, and equilibrium.

The Science of the total environment·2024

Same journal

Tolerance of larval and juvenile tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) to nitrogenous compounds.

Chemosphere·2026

Same journal

Reactivity and environmental fate of emerging contaminants in wastewater treatment systems: A reactive continuum framework approach.

Chemosphere·2026

Same journal

Vinasse fertigation modifies soil-microbiota-plant interactions and metabolism in sugarcane.

Chemosphere·2026

Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Exposure to the Polychlorinated biphenyl mixture Aroclor 1254 elicits neurological and cardiac developmental effects in early life stage zebrafish (Danio rerio)' [Chemosphere 371 (2025), 144023].

Chemosphere·2026

Same journal

Microplastic footprints in freshwater ecosystems: Raman spectroscopy of microplastics as indicator of anthropopressure in Northeastern Poland's lakes.

Chemosphere·2026

Same journal

Estimation of VOC emissions from an electric vehicle interior as a function of cabin air temperature using a selected ion tube flow mass spectrometer (SIFT-MS) measurement.

Chemosphere·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

How to establish detection limits for environmental microplastics analysis.

Wenjian Lao¹, Charles S Wong¹

¹Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, Costa Mesa, CA, 92626, USA.

|March 26, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

New methods accurately estimate the minimum detectable amount (MDA) for microplastic particles, addressing limitations of current techniques for discrete count data. This improves microplastic analysis and data reliability.

Keywords:

Analytical method Data reporting Detection capability Microplastic particle analysis Minimum detectable amount (MDA)

More Related Videos

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

Area of Science:

Environmental Science
Analytical Chemistry
Ecotoxicology

Background:

Accurate quantification of microplastics is essential for environmental monitoring and risk assessment.
Existing methods for determining analytical detection limits are inadequate for discrete count data, such as microplastic particles, which follow a Poisson distribution.
This necessitates the development of specialized approaches for microplastic analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate and propose appropriate methods for estimating the minimum detectable amount (MDA) of microplastic particles.
To address the limitations of current detection limit estimation techniques for discrete count data in microplastic analysis.
To provide a guideline for robust microplastic quantification.

Main Methods:

Applied techniques for low-level discrete observations to estimate MDA using blank sample data from an interlaboratory calibration exercise.
Utilized data from various matrices: clean water, dirty water, sediment, and fish tissue.
Defined two types of MDA: MDA_A for analytical method evaluation (using replicate blanks) and MDA_B for individual sample batch assessment (using a single blank).

Main Results:

Overall MDA_A values varied by matrix: 164 counts (clean water), 88 (dirty water), 192 (sediment), and 379 (tissue).
Significant interlaboratory variation in blank levels was observed, reflected in MDA_B values ranging from 14 to 247 across matrices.
MDA values for microplastic fibers were substantially higher than for non-fibers, indicating a need for separate reporting.

Conclusions:

The proposed MDA estimation methods offer a more accurate assessment of microplastic detection capabilities.
Reporting laboratory-specific and size-fraction-specific MDA values enhances data interpretability and comparability.
Implementing these guidelines will lead to more robust microplastic data, supporting environmental research and decision-making.