Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

151
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
151
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

431
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
431
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

132
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
132
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

7.9K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
7.9K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

431
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
431
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.3K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimizing Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Protocols in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

American journal of hypertension·2026
Same author

Impact of risk factor burden and vascular bed involvement on dementia risk in individuals with established cardiovascular disease.

American journal of preventive cardiology·2026
Same author

Frailty as a Modifier of the Associations Between Vascular Risk Factors and Incident Dementia.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Association of LDL protein cargo with segmental pulse wave velocity in older adults in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Frontiers in aging·2026
Same author

Oral Anticoagulants and Risk of Bleeding and Death in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

JACC. Advances·2026
Same author

Orthostatic Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Disease, and Hypotensive Events.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K

Case-control studies: Increasing scientific rigor in control selection.

Pamela L Lutsey1

  • 1Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
|March 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Properly selecting controls is crucial for robust case-control studies. This observational study design requires careful planning to enhance causal inference and scientific rigor, especially in hematologic research.

Keywords:
case-control studiesepidemiologic research design

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Case-control studies are observational, comparing exposure prevalence between disease (cases) and non-disease (controls) groups.
  • Effective design, particularly control selection, is vital for valid results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the case-control study design.
  • To highlight challenges in control selection and offer guidance for optimization.
  • To improve causal inference in hematologic research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of case-control study principles.
  • Discussion of common pitfalls in control selection.
  • Provision of practical recommendations for selecting appropriate controls.

Main Results:

  • Emphasizes that forethought is essential in case-control study design.
  • Identifies poor control selection as a significant threat to study validity.
  • Suggests that optimized control selection enhances causal inference.

Conclusions:

  • Careful control selection is paramount for the integrity of case-control studies.
  • Optimizing control selection increases scientific rigor, particularly in hematologic research.
  • Adherence to best practices in control selection strengthens epidemiological evidence.