Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs02:39

lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs

8.7K
In humans, more than 80% of the genome gets transcribed. However, only around 2% of the genome codes for proteins. The remaining part produces non-coding RNAs which includes ribosomal RNAs, transfer RNAs, telomerase RNAs, and regulatory RNAs, among other types. A large number of regulatory non-coding RNAs have been classified into two groups depending upon their length – small non-coding RNAs, such as microRNA, which are less than 200 nucleotides in length, and long non-coding RNA...
8.7K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

17.8K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
17.8K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.7K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Carrier Frequencies of Medically Actionable Pathogenic Variants in the Russian Population.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Cytokine-driven immunogenicity prediction: integrating HLA binding and cytokine induction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

The 3D genomics of lampbrush chromosomes highlights the role of active transcription in chromatin organization.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Signatures of high-altitude adaptation in Caucasus populations: evidence from the EGLN1-SPRTN locus.

Genetica·2026
Same author

An Exceptionally Complex Chromosome Rearrangement in the Great Tit <i>(Parus major)</i>: Genetic Composition, Meiotic Behavior and Population Frequency.

Cells·2026
Same author

AFToolkit: a framework for molecular modeling of proteins with AlphaFold-derived representations.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.0K

Cell type-specific interpretation of noncoding variants using deep learning-based methods.

Maria Sindeeva1, Nikolay Chekanov1, Manvel Avetisian1

  • 1AIRI, Moscow, 121170, Russia.

Gigascience
|March 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

DeepCT, a novel neural network, predicts noncoding variant effects across cell types by inferring missing epigenetic data. This advances human genetics by overcoming data limitations in machine learning models.

Keywords:
cell stateepigeneticsmachine learning

More Related Videos

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K
In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
06:41

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.0K
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K
In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
06:41

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Interpreting noncoding genomic variants is a major challenge in human genetics.
  • Machine learning (ML) models can predict the effects of noncoding mutations but require extensive, cell-type-specific experimental data.
  • Existing ML approaches are limited by the sparsity of available epigenetic data across human cell types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel ML approach that overcomes data limitations for predicting noncoding variant effects.
  • To infer missing epigenetic features and generalize predictions across diverse cell types.
  • To enable cell type-specific predictions of noncoding variant impacts.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed DeepCT, a new neural network architecture designed to learn interconnections within epigenetic features.
  • Developed DeepCT to infer unmeasured epigenetic data from available inputs.
  • Enabled DeepCT to learn cell type-specific properties and generate biologically meaningful vector representations of cell types.

Main Results:

  • DeepCT successfully infers missing epigenetic data, addressing the sparsity issue.
  • The model learns cell type-specific characteristics, creating distinct vector representations.
  • DeepCT generates accurate cell type-specific predictions for the effects of noncoding genomic variations.

Conclusions:

  • DeepCT offers a powerful solution for interpreting noncoding variants by overcoming epigenetic data scarcity.
  • The ability to infer data and generalize across cell types significantly advances the application of ML in human genetics.
  • This approach facilitates more precise, cell type-specific predictions of variant effects, aiding genetic research and clinical applications.