Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Digital vs speculum-guided catheter balloon insertion for cervical ripening in multiparas: a randomized controlled
Raneen Abu Shqara1, Yara Nakhleh Francis2, Habib Haj2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel (Drs Abu Shqara, Lowenstein, and Frank Wolf); Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel (Drs Abu Shqara, Nakhleh Francis, Haj, Markdorf, Lowenstein, and Frank Wolf).
Background:
Catheter balloon insertion into the maternal uterine cervix is routinely speculum guided; digital insertion has been reported, but it was not found to be more tolerable among nulliparas.
Objective:
In a cohort of multiparas, we aimed to evaluate maternal pain, the induction to delivery interval, and maternal satisfaction with digital insertion vs speculum-guided placement of a Foley catheter balloon for labor induction.
Study Design:
This randomized trial was conducted at a single, tertiary, university-affiliated hospital. The participants were multiparas (parity ≥1) and were admitted at term for labor induction with a Bishop score <6. They were randomized to 2 groups, namely the digital insertion and the speculum-guided Foley catheter insertion groups. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The co-primary outcomes were visual analog scale scores (0-10) and induction to delivery intervals. Secondary outcomes were procedure duration, maternal satisfaction, cervical ripening (Bishop score ≥6), delivery within 24 hours, infection rate, and neonatal outcomes.
Results:
A total of 50 women were analyzed for each study group. For the digitally inserted vs speculum-guided insertion group, the median visual analog scale score at catheter insertion was lower (4; range, 0-10; vs 7; range, 0-10; P<.001), and the induction to delivery interval was similar. For the digitally inserted vs speculum-guided insertion group, the median maternal satisfaction score was greater (5; range 3-5; vs 4; 1-5; P=.01), and the median procedure duration was shorter (2.1; range, 1.4-5.3 minutes vs 3.0; range, 1.4-5.0; P<.001). In the multivariate analysis, digital insertion (P=.009) and increased parity (P=.001) independently decreased the visual analog scale score. Cervical ripening, the maternal infection rate, and the neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusion:
Digital insertion of a Foley catheter balloon for cervical ripening in multiparas is less painful and quicker than speculum-guided insertion. It is also not inferior in terms of successful cervical ripening.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
08:00Reduction of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defects with an Anterior and Inferior Transseptal Puncture Site when Operating the Cryoballoon Ablation Catheter
Published on: June 15, 2015