Long-term functional results of revision hip replacement using Burch-Schneider cages

Valeriy Murylev1,2, Alexey Muzychenkov1,2, Pavel Elizarov1,2

  • 1I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University Sechenov University), Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation.

Insights

The Burch-Schneider cage is effective for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in cases of aseptic loosening, showing good long-term functional outcomes. This anti-protrusion system remains a valuable option for complex hip reconstructions.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common treatment for end-stage hip osteoarthritis.
  • Burch-Schneider cages are frequently used in revision THA, with over 125,000 implanted by 2006.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively analyze the use of Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cages in revision THA.
  • To evaluate the long-term functional results of revision THA using these cages.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 58 revision THA surgeries using Burch-Schneider cages for aseptic loosening.
  • Patient follow-up up to 17 years, with functional assessment using Harris, WOMAC, SF-36, and FJS-12 scales.
  • Classification of patients according to the Paprosky criteria (2C, 3A, 3B).

Main Results:

  • Good functional results were observed across Paprosky groups 2C, 3A, and 3B, with high Harris and FJS-12 scores.
  • Satisfactory functional outcomes were noted in Group 3B, despite being a more complex case.
  • 16 patients required re-revision surgery due to periprosthetic infection (5), aseptic loosening (7), or fracture (3).

Conclusions:

  • The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion system is a valid and effective option for revision THA, particularly for acetabular bone defects.
  • Despite advancements in surgical technology, Burch-Schneider cages remain relevant for specific indications in complex hip revision procedures.
  • Key indications include acetabular roof bone defects and acetabular floor bone mass loss.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos