Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yijie Liu1, Yuxiong Chen1, Zhen'ge Chang2
1Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Insights
The pooled inappropriate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rate is 6.1% worldwide, with higher rates in non-acute cases. This meta-analysis clarifies PCI appropriateness globally.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization aim to optimize percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs).
- Previous studies showed varied rates of inappropriate (rarely appropriate) PCIs across different populations.
- A comprehensive understanding of the pooled inappropriate PCI rate globally was lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the pooled rate of inappropriate percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) worldwide.
- To compare inappropriate PCI rates between acute and non-acute scenarios.
- To identify factors influencing inappropriate PCI rates.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Sinomed databases.
- Studies reporting inappropriate/rarely appropriate PCI rates were included in a random effects model meta-analysis.
- Statistical heterogeneity was addressed using a random effects model.
Main Results:
- Thirty-seven studies involving various PCI scenarios were analyzed.
- The pooled inappropriate PCI rate was 4.3% in acute scenarios and 8.9% in non-acute scenarios.
- The overall pooled inappropriate PCI rate was 6.1%, with significantly higher rates in non-acute compared to acute settings.
Conclusions:
- The global rate of inappropriate PCI is substantial, particularly in non-acute situations.
- Inappropriate PCI rates did not significantly differ based on study location, development level, or chronic total occlusion presence.
- Findings underscore the need for adherence to AUC to improve PCI appropriateness.
Background:
Since the foundation of appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization, the proportion of inappropriate (later revised as "rarely inappropriate") percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) varied in different populations. However, the pooled inappropriate PCI rate remains unknown.
Methods:
We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Sinomed databases for studies related to AUC and PCIs. Studies that reported inappropriate/rarely appropriate PCI rates were included. A random effects model was employed in the meta-analysis because of the high statistical heterogeneity.
Results:
Thirty-seven studies were included in our study, of which eight studies reported the appropriateness of acute PCIs or PCIs in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, 25 studies reported the appropriateness of non-acute/elective PCIs or PCIs in non-ACS/stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) patients, and 15 studies reported both acute and non-acute PCIs or did not distinguish the urgency of PCI. The pooled inappropriate PCI rate was 4.3% (95% CI: 2.6-6.4%) in acute scenarios, 8.9% (95% CI: 6.7-11.0%) in non-acute scenarios, and 6.1% (95% CI: 4.9-7.3%) overall. The inappropriate/rarely appropriate PCI rate was significantly higher in non-acute than acute scenarios. No difference in the inappropriate PCI rate was detected based on the study location, the country's level of development, or the presence of chronic total occlusion (CTO).
Conclusions:
The worldwide inappropriate PCI rate is generally identical but comparatively high, especially under non-acute scenarios.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies