Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
Identification of Immunogenic Cell-Death-Related Subtypes and Development of a Prognostic Signature in Gastric Cancer
Xuejun Gan1, Xiaohuan Tang1, Ziyu Li1
1Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ward I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Background:
Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is considered a promising type of regulated cell death and exerts effects by activating the adaptive immune response, reshaping the tumor environment (TME) and improving therapeutic efficacy. However, the potential roles and prognostic value of ICD-associated genes in gastric cancer (GC) remain unclear.
Methods:
The RNA expression data and clinical information of 1090 GC patients from six cohorts were collected. Consensus clustering was used to identify three distinct molecular subtypes. Then, a robust prognostic ICD_score for predicting prognosis was built via WGCNA and LASSO Cox regression according to the TCGA cohort, and the predictive capability of the ICD_score in GC patients was validated in the other cohorts. ICD-related immune features were analyzed using a CIBERSORT method and verified by immunofluorescence.
Results:
We found that ICD-related gene variations were correlated with clinical outcomes, tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) characteristics and treatment response. We then constructed an ICD signature that classifies cases as low- and high-ICD_score groups. The high-ICD_score group indicates unfavorable OS, a more advanced TNM stage, and presents an immune-suppressed phenotype, which has more infiltrations of pro-tumor immune cells, such as macrophages, which was verified by immunofluorescence. In addition, a nomogram containing the ICD_score showed a high predictive accuracy with AUCs of 0.715, 0.731 and 0.8 on Years 1, 3, and 5.
Conclusion:
We performed the first and synthesis ICD analysis in GC and built a clinical application tool based on the ICD signature, which paved a new path for assessing prognosis and guiding individual treatment.
More Related Videos
07:32Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018