Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CAR T cell therapy selectively depletes disease-driving mutant calreticulin cells in xenotransplants and human organoid models of myelofibrosis.

Science translational medicine·2026
Same author

Validation of Digital Cytology for Primary Diagnosis Across a Range of Specimen Types.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2026
Same author

Negative Selection Maintains Grossly Altered but Broadly Stable Karyotypes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Cancer discovery·2026
Same author

VS-FPM: Large-Format, Label-Free Virtual Histopathology Microscopy.

BME frontiers·2025
Same author

Epigenetically driven and early immune evasion in colorectal cancer evolution.

Nature genetics·2025
Same author

Alterations of the composition and spatial organization of the microenvironment following non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus through progression to cancer.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

RETRACTED: Sabir et al. DNA Based and Stimuli-Responsive Smart Nanocarrier for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer: Applications and Challenges. <i>Cancers</i> 2021, <i>13</i>, 3396.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Adeluola et al. Chemoprevention of 4-NQO-Induced Oral Cancer by the Combination of Resveratrol and EGCG: In Vivo, In Silico and In Vitro Studies. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 1098.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Peñalver et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma-Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO) 2026. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 395.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Accorsi Buttini et al. Development of a Simplified Geriatric Score-4 (SGS-4) to Predict Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged over 50. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 3278.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Age-Stratified Long-Term Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Stage IV Melanoma and NSCLC in The Netherlands: A Population-Based Study.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Targeting Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Tumor Microenvironment, and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Cancers·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy
15:04

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy

Published on: May 18, 2011

13.2K

Deep Learning Applied to Raman Spectroscopy for the Detection of Microsatellite Instability/MMR Deficient Colorectal

Nathan Blake1, Riana Gaifulina1, Lewis D Griffin2

  • 1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Cancers
|March 29, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Raman spectroscopy combined with deep learning shows promise for detecting colorectal cancer biomarkers. This technique can differentiate between microsatellite stable and unstable tissues, offering a potential solution for resource-limited testing.

Keywords:
Raman spectroscopycolorectal cancerdeep learningdiagnosticsmicrosatellite instabilityoncology

More Related Videos

Surface-enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering Nanoprobe Ratiometry for Detecting Microscopic Ovarian Cancer via Folate Receptor Targeting
07:54

Surface-enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering Nanoprobe Ratiometry for Detecting Microscopic Ovarian Cancer via Folate Receptor Targeting

Published on: March 25, 2019

8.2K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy
15:04

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy

Published on: May 18, 2011

13.2K
Surface-enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering Nanoprobe Ratiometry for Detecting Microscopic Ovarian Cancer via Folate Receptor Targeting
07:54

Surface-enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering Nanoprobe Ratiometry for Detecting Microscopic Ovarian Cancer via Folate Receptor Targeting

Published on: March 25, 2019

8.2K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Optics
  • Molecular Spectroscopy
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Defective DNA mismatch repair is a key pathway in colorectal cancer development.
  • Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a crucial biomarker for detecting this defect.
  • Current universal testing for MSI faces resource limitations, necessitating novel detection methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate Raman spectroscopy (RS) for distinguishing between normal, microsatellite stable (MSS), and microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) colorectal adenocarcinoma.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of deep learning models compared to traditional machine learning for MSI detection using RS data.
  • To identify biochemical differences between sample types using RS.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) for classifying colorectal tissue samples.
  • Comparison of the CNN with principal component analysis-linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) and support vector machine (SVM) models.
  • Utilized a nested cross-validation strategy with 30 samples (10 per group) and 1490 Raman spectra.

Main Results:

  • The CNN achieved 83% sensitivity and 45% specificity.
  • PCA-LDA demonstrated 82% sensitivity and 51% specificity.
  • Raman peaks associated with nucleic acids and collagen were implicated in sample discrimination.

Conclusions:

  • Raman spectroscopy, particularly when analyzed with deep learning, shows potential for accurate colorectal cancer biomarker detection.
  • The findings suggest RS can effectively discriminate between MSS and MSI-H tissues, offering a viable alternative for MSI testing.
  • The study highlights the molecular discriminative power of RS and implicates specific biochemical components in the detection process.