Mortality Evaluation and Life Expectancy Prediction of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Data Mining

The complexity of systemic variables and comorbidities makes it difficult to determine the best treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is impossible to perform a multidimensional evaluation of every patient, but the development of guidelines based on analyses of said complexities would be the next best option. Whereas conventional statistics are often inadequate for developing multivariate predictive models, data mining has proven more capable. Patients, methods and findings: Clinical profiles and treatment responses of 537 patients diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages B and C from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed using 4 decision tree algorithms. A combination of 19 treatments, 7 biomarkers, and 4 states of hepatitis was tested to determine which combinations would result in survival times greater than a year in duration. Just 2 of the algorithms produced complete models through single trees, which made them only the ones suitable for clinical judgement. A combination of alpha fetoprotein ≤210.5 mcg/L, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase ≤1.13 µkat/L, and total bilirubin ≤ 0.0283 mmol/L was shown to be a good predictor of survival >1 year, and the most effective treatments for such patients were radio-frequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with radiation therapy (RT). In patients without this combination, the best treatments were RFA, TACE with RT and targeted drug therapy, and TACE with targeted drug therapy and immunotherapy. The main limitation of this study was its small sample. With a small sample size, we may have developed a less reliable model system, failing to produce any clinically important results or outcomes.

Data mining can produce models to help clinicians predict survival time at the time of initial HCC diagnosis and then choose the most suitable treatment.