Surgical Risk Factors for Delayed Oral Feeding Autonomy in Patients with Left-Sided Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Mélina Bourezma1, Sébastien Mur2,3,4, Laurent Storme2,3,4

  • 1CHU Lille, Clinic of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, FR-59000 Lille, France.

Insights

Prophylactic gastrostomy and surgical reoperation are key factors delaying oral feeding autonomy in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). These interventions, along with potential bowel obstruction, significantly impact a child's ability to feed independently.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Neonatology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) presents significant challenges in pediatric care, particularly concerning nutritional and digestive health.
  • Achieving oral feeding autonomy is a critical milestone for patients with CDH, impacting their overall management and long-term outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify perinatal risk factors associated with delayed oral feeding autonomy in infants diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
  • To analyze antenatal, postnatal, and perisurgical data to understand the predictors of feeding independence.

Main Methods:

  • A monocentric cohort study included 138 patients with CDH, with 84 analyzed after exclusions.
  • Patients were categorized based on achieving oral feeding autonomy at hospital discharge versus requiring nutritional support.
  • Statistical analysis, adjusted for patch repair necessity, examined various clinical factors.

Main Results:

  • Prophylactic gastrostomy was significantly associated with delayed oral feeding autonomy (OR adjusted: 16.3).
  • Surgical reoperation also emerged as a significant risk factor for delayed oral feeding (OR adjusted: 5.1).
  • Factors like lung-to-head ratio, liver/stomach position, and operative duration were not significantly related to feeding autonomy.

Conclusions:

  • Over one-third of CDH patients experience delayed oral feeding autonomy.
  • Prophylactic gastrostomy and surgical reoperations are identified as significant risk factors impacting feeding independence.
  • Bowel obstruction may also affect oral feeding autonomy, suggesting a need for individualized assessment of prophylactic gastrostomy.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding01:15

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding

Enteral nutrition encompasses various methods of delivering nutrition directly to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, bypassing traditional oral intake. It is particularly beneficial for patients who cannot eat by mouth but have a functioning digestive system. Key methods include nasointestinal feeding, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy, each suited to different clinical scenarios based on the patient's needs and condition.
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
229
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
140
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding01:26

Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding

Enteral nutrition delivers nutrients directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube. This method is appropriate for patients who cannot eat but still have a functioning digestive system. It is also beneficial for individuals with swallowing difficulties, anorexia, malabsorption, or those who have undergone gastrointestinal (GI) surgery.
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
401
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
Clinical Manifestations:
109