Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
Published on: October 20, 2020
Interlaboratory variation for NT-proBNP among Swedish laboratories in an external quality program 2011-2021
Morgan Lundgren1, Peter Ridefelt1, Mathias Karlsson2
1Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Standardization of NT-proBNP testing is crucial for accurate heart failure diagnosis. Method variations can lead to different patient treatments, emphasizing the need for common calibrators and reference materials.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biomarker Analysis
- Cardiovascular Diagnostics
Background:
- N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a key biomarker for diagnosing heart failure.
- Established clinical decision limits for NT-proBNP vary based on clinical context (acute vs. chronic) and international guidelines.
- Limited standardization across different NT-proBNP assay methods poses a challenge for consistent patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the analytical variability of NT-proBNP assays from different manufacturers.
- To evaluate the impact of method standardization on clinical decision-making for heart failure.
- To identify the need for improved standardization in NT-proBNP testing.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of external quality assessment data for NT-proBNP from Equalis (Sweden) between 2011-2021.
- Categorization of data by manufacturer and comparison of median values to consensus medians.
- Calculation of coefficient of variation (CV%) for each manufacturer across different NT-proBNP concentration levels.
Main Results:
- Roche assays showed median results closest to the consensus median.
- Total CV for NT-proBNP levels between 0-500 ng/L ranged from 4% to 27%.
- Significant inter-manufacturer variability was observed, with some methods yielding results substantially above or below the consensus median (e.g., Siemens, Abbott).
Conclusions:
- The introduction of new NT-proBNP methods since 2017 has decreased inter-manufacturer agreement.
- Clinical guidelines, often based on specific assay methods (e.g., Roche), may not account for current method-related biases.
- A common calibrator and standardized reference materials are essential to improve NT-proBNP assay harmonization and ensure reliable clinical application.
More Related Videos
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
11:00High-throughput Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Animal Specimens by Nanoscale PCR
Published on: November 28, 2016