Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Automatic measurement of slice thickness in CT images of a Siemens phantom
Nada S Amatullah1, Choirul Anam1, Eko Hidayanto1
1Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Soedarto SH, Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia.
Abstract:
This study aims to develop a program in Python language for automatic measurement of slice thickness in computed tomography (CT) images of a Siemens phantom with different values of slice thickness, field of view (FOV), and pitch. A Siemens phantom was scanned using a Siemens 64-slice Somatom Perspective CT scanner with various slice thicknesses (i.e. 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm), FOVs (i.e. 220, 260, and 300 mm), and pitch (i.e. 0.7, 0.9, and 1). Automatic measurement of slice thickness was performed by segmenting the ramp insert in the image and detecting angles of the ramp insert using the Hough transform. The resulting angles were subsequently used to rotate the image. Profiles of pixel along the ramp insert were made from the rotated images, and the slice thickness was calculated by determining the full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the profiles. The product of the FWHM in pixels and the pixel size was corrected by the tangent of the ramp insert (i.e., 23°) to obtain the measured slice thickness. The results of the automatic measurements were compared with manual measurements carried out using a MicroDicom Viewer. The differences between the automatic and manual measurements at all slice thicknesses were less than 0.30 mm. The automatic and manual measurements had high linear correlations. For variations of the FOV and pitch, the differences between the automatic and manual measurement were less than 0.16 mm. The automatic and manual measurements were significantly different (p-value < 0.05) for slice thickness variation. In addition, the automatic and manual measurements were not significantly different (p-value > 0.05) for variations of FOV and pitch.
More Related Videos
09:36Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
Published on: March 14, 2018
09:21Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
Published on: February 18, 2015