Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2025

Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy As a Chronic Heart Failure Model in Swine
Published on: February 17, 2018
Pacing induced cardiomyopathy: recognition and management.
Shunmuga Sundaram Ponnusamy1, Thabish Syed1, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman2
1Division of Cardiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Right ventricle apex pacing is standard but can cause heart muscle damage (pacing-induced cardiomyopathy). Alternative pacing methods like conduction system pacing may reduce this risk and potentially reverse damage.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Right ventricle (RV) apex pacing is the conventional method due to implantation ease and safety.
- RV pacing can lead to electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, causing adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling.
- This remodeling increases risks of heart failure (HF) hospitalization, arrhythmias, and mortality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the definition, prevalence, risk factors, and management of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PIC).
- To compare the risks of PIC with RV pacing versus alternative pacing strategies.
- To explore the potential of alternative pacing to reverse PIC.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and synthesis of existing studies on RV pacing and PIC.
- Analysis of definitions and reported prevalence of PIC.
- Identification and summary of risk factors associated with PIC development.
- Evaluation of evidence for conduction system pacing (CSP) and biventricular pacing in PIC prevention and reversal.
Main Results:
- Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy is defined by reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and/or new-onset HF or atrial fibrillation (AF) post-implantation.
- Pooled prevalence of PIC ranges from 6% to 25%, with an overall estimate of 12%.
- Risk factors include male sex, chronic kidney disease, prior myocardial infarction, baseline LVEF, QRS duration, and RV pacing burden.
- Conduction system pacing (His bundle, left bundle branch) may lower PIC risk compared to RV pacing.
- Biventricular pacing and CSP show potential for reversing PIC.
Conclusions:
- While RV apex pacing remains standard, its potential to induce cardiomyopathy necessitates consideration of alternative sites.
- Conduction system pacing offers a promising alternative to mitigate PIC risk.
- Both biventricular pacing and CSP may be effective in managing and reversing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification

