CT Perfusion vs Noncontrast CT for Late Window Stroke Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late window (6-24 hours) can be evaluated with CT perfusion (CTP) or with noncontrast CT (NCCT) only. Whether outcomes differ depending on the type of imaging selection is unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between CTP and NCCT for EVT selection in the late therapeutic window.

This study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines. A systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Studies focusing on late-window AIS undergoing EVT imaged through CTP and NCCT were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcome of interest was rate of functional independence, defined as modified Rankin scale 0-2. The secondary outcomes of interest included rates of successful reperfusion, defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

Five studies with 3,384 patients were included in our analysis. There were comparable rates of functional independence (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% CI 0.87-1.22; p = 0.71) and sICH (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.58-2.04; p = 0.80) between the 2 groups. Patients imaged with CTP had higher rates of successful reperfusion (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.64; p = 0.015) and lower rates of mortality (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96; p = 0.017).

Although recovery of functional independence after late-window EVT was not more common in patients selected by CTP when compared with patients selected by NCCT only, patients selected by CTP had lower mortality.