A Hybrid Algorithm Combining Population Pharmacokinetic and Machine Learning for Isavuconazole Exposure Prediction
Alexandre Destere1,2, Pierre Marquet1,3, Marc Labriffe1,3
1Pharmacology and Transplantation, INSERM U1248, Université de Limoges, 2 Rue du Pr Descottes, 87000, Limoges, France.
Objectives:
Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP-BE) based on a limited sampling strategy and a population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) model is used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters. Recently, we proposed a methodology that combined population pharmacokinetic and machine learning (ML) to decrease the bias and imprecision in individual iohexol clearance prediction. The aim of this study was to confirm the previous results by developing a hybrid algorithm combining POPPK, MAP-BE and ML that accurately predicts isavuconazole clearance.
Methods:
A total of 1727 isavuconazole rich PK profiles were simulated using a POPPK model from the literature, and MAP-BE was used to estimate the clearance based on: (i) the full PK profiles (refCL); and (ii) C24h only (C24h-CL). Xgboost was trained to correct the error between refCL and C24h-CL in the training dataset (75%). C24h-CL as well as ML-corrected C24h-CL were evaluated in a testing dataset (25%) and then in a set of PK profiles simulated using another published POPPK model.
Results:
A strong decrease in mean predictive error (MPE%), imprecision (RMSE%) and the number of profiles outside ± 20% MPE% (n-out20%) was observed with the hybrid algorithm (decreased in MPE% by 95.8% and 85.6%; RMSE% by 69.5% and 69.0%; n-out20% by 97.4% and 100% in the training and testing sets, respectively. In the external validation set, the hybrid algorithm decreased MPE% by 96%, RMSE% by 68% and n-out20% by 100%.
Conclusion:
The hybrid model proposed significantly improved isavuconazole AUC estimation over MAP-BE based on the sole C24h and may improve dose adjustment.
More Related Videos
06:14Optimized LC-MS/MS Method for the High-throughput Analysis of Clinical Samples of Ivacaftor, Its Major Metabolites, and Lumacaftor in Biological Fluids of Cystic Fibrosis Patients
Published on: October 15, 2017
10:46Rapid in vivo Drug Response Prediction Using Leukemia Cell Grafts in Zebrafish Embryos
Published on: May 23, 2025
Related Concept Videos
01:12Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
01:26Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
00:59Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
01:14Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
01:20Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
01:06Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...