Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Fix the backlash against public health
Lawrence O Gostin1, Sarah Wetter2
1Lawrence O. Gostin is University Professor at Georgetown University, where he directs the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract:
Societies generally have reacted to deadly epidemics by strengthening health systems, including laws. Under American federalism (the constitutional division of power between states and the federal government), individual states hold primary public health powers. State legislatures have historically granted health officials wide-ranging authority. After the anthrax attacks in the United States in 2001, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) supported the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, which granted public health officials even more expansive powers to declare a health emergency and respond swiftly. But all that ended with COVID-19, as state legislatures and courts gutted this authority. The next pandemic could be far deadlier than COVID-19, but when the public looks to federal and state governments to protect them, they may find that health officials have their hands tied behind their backs.
Related Concept Videos
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

