An argument-based validation study of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program

Area of Science:

• Surgical Education
• Medical Assessment
• Validation Studies

Background:

• The Fundamentals of Laparoscopy Surgery (FLS) program has been established for over 15 years.
• Advancements in laparoscopy have necessitated a re-evaluation of existing educational programs.
• An argument-based validation study was conducted to address these changes.

Purpose of the Study:

• To exemplify an argument-based approach to validation for surgical education researchers.
• To use the FLS program as a case study for this validation methodology.
• To demonstrate the application of validation principles in surgical training.

Main Methods:

• The argument-based validation approach involves developing interpretation and use arguments.
• It includes conducting research to gather evidence.
• The process culminates in building a comprehensive validity argument.

Main Results:

• Qualitative and quantitative data were collected during the FLS validity examination.
• Evidence gathered supported claims and provided backing for potential rebuttals.
• Key findings were synthesized into a structured validity argument.

Conclusions:

• The argument-based validation approach offers advantages over other methods.
• It aligns with foundational documents in assessment and evaluation research.
• Its systematic language and logical reasoning enhance the communication and clarity of validation processes and outcomes.