Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night
Published on: December 29, 2021
A light-exploiting insectivorous bat shows no melatonin disruption under lights with different spectra
Alicia M Dimovski1,2, Stephen R Griffiths1,2, Kerry V Fanson1
1School of Agriculture, Biomedicine & Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, Australia.
Artificial light at night (ALAN) can disrupt wildlife, but this study found no effect on the urinary melatonin of Gould's wattled bats exposed to various LED lights. Short-term LED exposure did not impact the circadian physiology of this insectivorous bat species.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Chronobiology
- Animal Physiology
Background:
- Natural light-dark cycles regulate animal circadian rhythms.
- Artificial light at night (ALAN) can disrupt these rhythms, particularly in nocturnal species like bats.
- While behavioral impacts of ALAN on bats are known, physiological effects remain under-investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the physiological impact of different artificial light spectra on insectivorous bats.
- To determine if short-wavelength or long-wavelength artificial light affects melatonin production in bats.
- To assess the effect of LED light exposure on urinary melatonin-sulfate levels in Gould's wattled bats.
Main Methods:
- Collected urine samples from Gould's wattled bats (Chalinolobus gouldii) under natural night conditions.
- Exposed bats to different LED light spectra: red (630 nm), amber (601 nm), filtered warm white (586 nm), and cool white (457 nm).
- Measured melatonin-sulfate concentrations in urine samples to assess circadian rhythm disruption.
Main Results:
- No significant effect of any LED light treatment on urinary melatonin-sulfate levels was observed.
- Melatonin-sulfate levels remained consistent across baseline (natural night) and all tested artificial light conditions.
- The spectral composition of the LEDs did not influence the physiological response in terms of melatonin-sulfate.
Conclusions:
- Short-term exposure to various LED light spectra does not appear to disrupt the circadian physiology of Gould's wattled bats.
- Gould's wattled bats, as a light-exploiting species, may possess resilience to nocturnal artificial light.
- Further research is needed to understand the long-term or broader physiological consequences of ALAN on bat species.
More Related Videos
07:14Light Preference Assay to Study Innate and Circadian Regulated Photobehavior in Drosophila Larvae
Published on: April 20, 2013
06:16An Experimental Approach to Investigating Effects of Artificial Light at Night on Free-Ranging Animals: Implementation, Results, and Directions for Future Research
Published on: February 2, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Management of Insomnia
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation