Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Accelerating Diagnostic Accuracy with Direct Identification of Gram-Negatives from Blood Culture Bottles
Published on: May 24, 2024
EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) compared to conventional susceptibility testing:
Gregory Strubbe1, Anne-Sophie Messiaen1, Stien Vandendriessche1
1Department of Medical Microbiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Objectives:
EUCAST breakpoints for short incubation disk diffusion allow rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) directly from positive blood cultures. We evaluate the RAST methodology and assess its potential added value in a setting of low prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms.
Methods:
In our two-part study, we performed RAST on 127 clinical blood cultures at 6 and 8 h and determined categorical agreement with direct susceptibility testing. We also measure the impact of susceptibility results on antimicrobial therapy compared to empirical treatment.
Results:
Categorical agreement was 96.2% at 6 h (575/598 isolate-drug combinations) and 96.6% at 8 h (568/588 combinations). Major errors involved piperacillin/tazobactam in 16 of 31 cases. The second part of our study shows that AST reporting proved essential in correcting ineffective empirical therapy in 6.3% of the patients (8/126).
Conclusion:
EUCAST RAST is an inexpensive and reliable method of susceptibility testing, although care must be taken with reporting piperacillin/tazobactam. In support of RAST implementation, we show that AST remains of great importance in providing effective therapy, even in a setting of low MDR prevalence and elaborate antibiotic guidelines.
More Related Videos
12:08Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing by Stimulated Raman Scattering Imaging of Deuterium Incorporation in a Single Bacterium
Published on: February 14, 2022
08:30One-day Workflow Scheme for Bacterial Pathogen Detection and Antimicrobial Resistance Testing from Blood Cultures
Published on: July 9, 2012