Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

4.4K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
4.4K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

449
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
449
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis01:21

Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis

847
Mass spectrometry is an important technique for the identification of pure compounds. However, it has some limitations for the analysis of complex mixtures, often due to excessive fragmentation making the spectrum too complicated to decipher. Mass spectrometry can be combined with suitable separation methods in sequence, forming hyphenated methods, which are useful in the analysis of complex mixtures.
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
847
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry01:19

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

5.0K
Mass spectrometry is a powerful characterization technique that can identify and separate a wide variety of compounds ranging from chemical to biological entities, based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). The instruments that allow this detection, known as mass spectrometers, have three components: an ion source, a mass analyzer, and a detector. These spectrometers differ based on the nature of their ion source and analyzers.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is a commonly...
5.0K
Mass Spectrometry: Molecular Fragmentation Overview01:20

Mass Spectrometry: Molecular Fragmentation Overview

3.4K
The ionization of a molecule into a molecular ion inside the mass spectrometer causes instability in the molecule's structure due to the loss of an electron. This eventually leads to the fragmentation or breaking of some bonds in the molecule. The fragmentation occurs predominantly at specific bonds to yield relatively stable fragments.
One type of fragmentation pattern is the cleavage of a single bond in the molecular ion. The cleavage leads to a radical and a cation. The cleavage can...
3.4K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

515
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
515

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prognostic impact of <i>NF1</i> mutation in Korean cohort with glioblastoma.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

Optimization of quantitative analysis method for carboxyhemoglobin in severely decomposed spleen tissue influenced by a reducing agent.

Forensic science international·2025
Same author

Correction: Advancing forensic accuracy: mitigating methemoglobin interference in postmortem carbon monoxide analysis using sodium dithionite reduction.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Prolonged Intestinal Ethanol Absorption and Oxidative Stress: Revisiting the Gut-Liver Axis in Alcohol-Associated Disease.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

KNU-DTI: KNowledge United Drug-Target Interaction prediction.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

De novo drug design through gradient-based regularized search in information-theoretically controlled latent space.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.1K

Fire accelerant classification from GC-MS data of suspected arson cases using machine-learning models.

Chihyun Park1, Joon-Bae Lee2, Wooyong Park1

  • 1Daejeon District Office, National Forensic Service, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.

Forensic Science International
|March 31, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models accurately classify fire accelerants from arson cases using GC-MS data. Convolutional neural networks achieved the highest accuracy, identifying key chemical fingerprints for arson investigation.

Keywords:
ArsonClassificationConvolutional neural networkFire accelerantMachine-learning

More Related Videos

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool
05:31

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool

Published on: May 25, 2021

7.2K
A Two-Step Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography Method with Mass Spectrometric Detection for Identification of Tattoo Ink Ingredients and Counterfeit Products
08:07

A Two-Step Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography Method with Mass Spectrometric Detection for Identification of Tattoo Ink Ingredients and Counterfeit Products

Published on: May 22, 2019

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.1K
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool
05:31

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool

Published on: May 25, 2021

7.2K
A Two-Step Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography Method with Mass Spectrometric Detection for Identification of Tattoo Ink Ingredients and Counterfeit Products
08:07

A Two-Step Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography Method with Mass Spectrometric Detection for Identification of Tattoo Ink Ingredients and Counterfeit Products

Published on: May 22, 2019

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • Arson investigation relies on identifying fire accelerants in residue samples.
  • Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a standard technique for analyzing fire debris.
  • Accurate classification of accelerants is crucial for legal proceedings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning models for classifying fire accelerants.
  • To compare the performance of random forest, support vector machine, and convolutional neural network models.
  • To identify potential chemical fingerprints indicative of specific fire accelerants.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a GC-MS dataset comprising approximately 4000 suspected arson cases.
  • Developed three machine learning classification models: random forest, support vector machine, and convolutional neural network.
  • Trained models to classify fire residue into six categories: no accelerant, gasoline, kerosene, diesel, solvents, or candle.

Main Results:

  • Classification accuracies were 0.88 for random forest, 0.88 for support vector machine, and 0.92 for convolutional neural network.
  • The convolutional neural network model demonstrated superior performance in accelerant classification.
  • Feature importance analysis of the random forest model revealed potential chemical markers for different accelerants.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning models, particularly CNNs, are effective tools for classifying fire accelerants in arson investigations.
  • GC-MS data combined with ML can enhance the accuracy and efficiency of forensic analysis.
  • The identified chemical fingerprints can aid in the forensic identification of fire accelerants.