The superego: a revised developmental model

The superego is not, as psychoanalytic theory asserts, primarily heir to the oedipus complex. Freud proposed two theories of identification and superego formation, only one of which is widely known and accepted. The first, which he abandoned, argues for the genesis of conscience as compensation for lost narcissism. The second explains superego formation as a response to object loss and fear of castration. The latter view faces a number of anomalies, including the occurrence of preoedipal and postoedipal identifications unrelated to the castration complex, and the difficulty in providing a cause for female superego development. An alternative theory is proposed that returns to Freud's first theory of identification, arguing that gender-specific explanations are inappropriate for a phenomenon such as conscience, which occurs in both sexes. Prototypical male and female cases are presented alongside a general model of the development of ego processes and object relations. Case material is briefly examined, and the argument is made for conceptualizing psychosexual development as a developmental line rather than as the core of character formation.