Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Thermodynamic Potentials01:26

Thermodynamic Potentials

901
Thermodynamic potentials are state functions that are extremely useful in analyzing a thermodynamic system. They have dimensions of energy. The four important thermodynamic potentials are internal energy, enthalpy, Helmholtz free energy, and Gibbs free energy. These thermodynamic potentials can be expressed using two of the following variables: pressure, volume, temperature, and entropy. These two variables are expressed as the rate of change of the thermodynamic potential with respect to other...
901
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

34.6K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
34.6K
Van der Waals Interactions01:24

Van der Waals Interactions

64.2K
Atoms and molecules interact with each other through intermolecular forces. These electrostatic forces arise from attractive or repulsive interactions between particles with permanent, partial, or temporary charges. The intermolecular forces between neutral atoms and molecules are ion–dipole, dipole–dipole, and dispersion forces, collectively known as van der Waals forces.
64.2K
Van der Waals Equation01:10

Van der Waals Equation

4.3K
The ideal gas law is an approximation that works well at high temperatures and low pressures. The van der Waals equation of state (named after the Dutch physicist Johannes van der Waals, 1837−1923) improves it by considering two factors.
First, the attractive forces between molecules, which are stronger at higher densities and reduce the pressure, are considered by adding to the pressure a term equal to the square of the molar density multiplied by a positive coefficient a. Second, the volume...
4.3K
Intermolecular vs Intramolecular Forces03:00

Intermolecular vs Intramolecular Forces

87.9K
Intermolecular forces (IMF) are electrostatic attractions arising from charge-charge interactions between molecules. The strength of the intermolecular force is influenced by the distance of separation between molecules. The forces significantly affect the interactions in solids and liquids, where the molecules are close together. In gases, IMFs become important only under high-pressure conditions (due to the proximity of gas molecules). Intermolecular forces dictate the physical properties of...
87.9K
Intermolecular Forces and Physical Properties02:56

Intermolecular Forces and Physical Properties

21.1K
21.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Li-P-S Electrolyte Materials as a Benchmark for Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Medium-Range Structural Order in Amorphous Arsenic.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

The Zintl-Klemm Concept in the Amorphous State: A Case Study of Na-P Battery Anodes.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2025
Same author

A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Assessing zero-shot generalisation behaviour in graph-neural-network interatomic potentials.

Digital discovery·2025
Same author

Full-cycle device-scale simulations of memory materials with a tailored atomic-cluster-expansion potential.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Revisiting crossed-correlated baths in open quantum systems simulated by HEOM or T-TEDOPA.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Vesicle size and membrane composition control monomer transfer pathways in multicomponent lipid vesicles.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Polaron-mediated exciton dynamics of P(NDI2OD-T2) unveiled by transient absorption spectroscopy under electrochemical conditions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Green-Kubo relation in a mesoscale odd fluid model.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Nitrogenation of microscopic MoS2 surfaces by oxidation scanning probe lithography.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Molecular structure, binding, and disorder in TDBC-Ag plexcitonic assemblies.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K

How to validate machine-learned interatomic potentials.

Joe D Morrow1, John L A Gardner1, Volker L Deringer1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QR, United Kingdom.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|April 1, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning (ML) potentials offer accurate, large-scale atomistic simulations. This review details best practices for validating these ML potentials in materials modeling for reliable results.

More Related Videos

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
08:54

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid

Published on: January 25, 2020

5.7K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K
Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
08:54

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid

Published on: January 25, 2020

5.7K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Physics

Background:

  • Machine learning (ML) potentials are increasingly used for large-scale atomistic simulations.
  • These potentials achieve near-quantum-mechanical accuracy by learning from reference data.
  • Validation is crucial, especially for physically agnostic ML potentials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the principles of ML potentials for atomic-scale material modeling.
  • To discuss best practices for validating ML potentials.
  • To provide recommendations for the research community.

Main Methods:

  • Review of ML potential principles.
  • Discussion of numerical error metrics for validation.
  • Exploration of physically guided validation strategies.

Main Results:

  • ML potentials enable efficient and accurate atomistic simulations.
  • Careful validation is essential for reliable application of ML potentials.
  • Established best practices enhance the trustworthiness of ML potential predictions.

Conclusions:

  • This review provides a framework for validating ML potentials in materials modeling.
  • Recommendations are offered to ensure the robust application of ML potentials.
  • The findings aim to support researchers using ML potentials for materials discovery and design.