Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
A retrospective multi-center feasibility study of a new PTV margin estimation approach for moving targets using
Payam Samadi Miandoab1, Shahyar Saramad1, Saeed Setayeshi1
1Department of Energy Engineering and Physics, Medical Radiation Engineering Group, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Purpose:
This study investigates a new approach for estimating the planning target volume (PTV) margin for moving tumors treated with robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
Methods:
In this new approach, the covariance of modeling and prediction errors was estimated using error propagation and implemented in the Van Herk formula to form a Modified Van Herk formula (MVHF). To perform a retrospective multi-center analysis, the MVHF was studied using 163 patients treated with different system versions of robotic SBRT (G3 version 6.2.3, VSI version 8.5, and VSI version 9.5) and compared with two established PTV margins estimation methods: The original Van Herk Formula (VHF) and the Uncertainty Estimation Method (UEM).
Results:
Overall, the PTV margins provided by the three formalisms are similar with 4-5 mm in the lung region and 4 mm in abdomen region to the PTV margins used in clinical. Furthermore, when analyzing individual patients, a difference of up to 1 mm was found between the PTV margin estimations using MVHF and VHF. The corresponding average discrepancies for the superior-inferior (SI) direction ranged between -0.19 mm to 0.38 mm in CK G3 version 6.2.3, -0.36 mm to 0.33 mm in CK VSI version 8.5, and -0.34 mm to 0.40 mm in CK VSI version 9.5.
Conclusions:
It was found that for the lower left lung, upper left lung, lower right lung, upper right lung, central liver, and upper liver, the effect of covariance between model and prediction errors in SI direction was around 20%, 30%, 25%, 25%, 25%, and 30%, respectively. Notable covariance effects between model and prediction errors can be considered in PTV margin estimation using a modified VHF, which allowed for more precise target localization in robotic SBRT for moving tumors. Overall, in each of the three directions, the difference between MVHF and utilized clinical margins is 0.65 mm in the lung and abdominal region. Therefore, to improve the clinical PTV margins with the new approach, it is suggested to use the adaptive PTV margins in the next fractions.
