Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Efficacy of Coronary Sinus Pacing for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-induced Sick Sinus
Shun Yokota1, Nobuaki Igarashi1, Tomofumi Doi1
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kobe Hospital, Japan.
Insights
Atrial pacing with coronary sinus pacing can stabilize hemodynamics in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This combined approach proved effective when ventricular pacing alone failed to manage cardiogenic shock.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) can cause hemodynamic instability and cardiogenic shock.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can sometimes induce SSS due to complications like impaired sinus node artery (SNA) blood flow.
- Ventricular pacing alone may be insufficient to manage SSS-induced hemodynamic compromise.
Observation:
- Two cases presented with cardiogenic shock and SSS post-PCI.
- The SSS was attributed to compromised SNA flow, with a stent jailed across the lesion.
- Initial management with ventricular pacing alone did not adequately stabilize hemodynamics.
Findings:
- Combined atrial pacing and coronary sinus (CS) pacing successfully improved hemodynamic instability in both cases.
- This dual-pacing strategy effectively addressed the challenges posed by SSS when ventricular pacing was inadequate.
- The findings suggest a potential benefit of adding atrial pacing to CS pacing in specific SSS scenarios.
Implications:
- Atrial pacing combined with CS pacing may be a valuable therapeutic option for managing hemodynamic instability in PCI-induced SSS.
- This approach could offer an alternative or adjunct to standard pacing in complex cases of SSS.
- Further research is warranted to explore the broader applicability and long-term efficacy of this combined pacing strategy.
Abstract:
We herein report two cases of atrial pacing with coronary sinus (CS) pacing performed to improve hemodynamic instability in cardiogenic shock due to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-induced sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Ventricular pacing alone made it difficult to stabilize hemodynamics due to SSS, which had been caused by the lack of reflow and slow flow of the sinus node artery (SNA) jailed with a stent. Adding atrial pacing with CS pacing may be useful, as in our two cases, where ventricular pacing alone was unable to stabilize hemodynamics.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias I: Sinus Arrhythmias
Types of Arrhythmias
Sinus Node Arrhythmias
Sinus Bradycardia: Originating from the sinoatrial (SA) node, sinus bradycardia involves slower impulses, resulting in a heart rate of less than 60 beats per minute (bpm). Causes include sleep, vagal stimulation, beta-blockers, hypothyroidism, and...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy