Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025
Fluorescence Angiography for Evaluation of Aneurysm Perfusion and Parent Artery Patency in Rat and Rabbit Aneurysm Models
Published on: July 24, 2019
Randomized, Comparative Study of Full- and Half-Dose Fluorescein Angiography
Vaama Patel1, Sarah Syeda1, John Zeiter1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomic Sciences and the Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Purpose:
This study determines whether fluorescein angiography (FA) with a 250-mg dose of fluorescein (half dose) is equal in quality to the standard 500-mg dose of fluorescein (full dose) when using digital ultra-widefield (UWF) technology.
Methods:
In a randomized, prospective study using a UWF imaging system, FAs performed with half dose were compared with angiograms performed with full dose. Imaging studies were reviewed by 4 reviewers based on 6 characteristics: dye transit, macrovasculature, macula detail, microvasculature, leakage, and overall quality. The scores for macrovasculature, macula detail, microvasculature, and overall quality were converted to a fuzzy rating score to confirm results.
Results:
Seventy-nine FAs from 67 patients were reviewed for this study, including 12 patients who had both half-dose and full-dose FAs. Of all the factors studied, only microvasculature received a significantly different score between full dose and half dose that was confirmed by the fuzzy rating scale (3.79 vs 3.53; P = .04). Among those eyes that received both full and half dose, there was no significant difference in any of the 6 factors.
Conclusions:
In a UWF imaging system, aside from looking at fine microvascular abnormalities, the 250-mg dose of fluorescein provided similar results to a 500-mg dose. The images were not significantly different in overall quality.
