An Analysis of the Viability of Nonvascular Iliac and Fibula Grafts in Mandibular Reconstruction in Patients with...

Vascularized bone grafts are considered as the gold standard for mandibular reconstruction. However, there are certain limitations of them, such as they are contraindicated in patients with circulatory disturbances. Therefore, Non-vascular bone grafts become the viable option for reconstruction. Our study aims to prospectively compare the long-term viability of avascular iliac and fibula bone grafts in the reconstruction of mandibular defects. Objectives were to evaluate the difficulty in swallowing, mastication, speech problems, infection, wound dehiscence, restricted limb movement, and altered gait among the iliac and fibula group. A total of 14 patients, planned for the reconstruction of mandibular defects from 2016 to 2018 were randomly allocated into two groups; nonvascular iliac and fibula graft groups. Clinical assessment for improvement in function, esthetics, wound healing, pain, and donor site morbidity was done and was followed up for one year. Digital orthopantomogram was taken for radiographic evaluation for up to one year. Difficulty in swallowing, mastication, speech, infection, restricted limb movement, and altered gait was statistically significant and was seen more in the fibula group. Wound dehiscence with graft exposure was found in one subject. The overall success rate was 100% in the iliac group and 85.7% in the fibula group. Considering the long-term complications and success rate, the nonvascular iliac graft was found to be superior and can be used as an alternative to a nonvascular fibula graft for a defect length up to 7 cm.