Video Head Impulse Test: A Comparison and Analysis of Three Recording Systems

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and reproducibility of three existing systems in a group of healthy individuals for vHIT. A prospective randomized study was conducted on 12 healthy individuals. The vHIT tests were carried out. The values of the gains for the 3SCCs of each ear were collected using the three devices. The expected average gain of 1 was the gain standard. The statistical significance in the difference in gains were assessed. There is good reproducibility of the results of the vHIT examination. EyeSeeCam appeared to be the worst performing system with a slightly overstated average gain of 1.15. Otometrics has longest average examination time per patient. Synapsis is the system with the best quality/time invested and easiest to access. Video head impulse system depends on the examiner's preference, reproducible and superimposable depending on the examiner and experience.