Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual feedback during speech production.

N Tye-Murray

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
    |April 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Delayed visual feedback can disrupt speech production, but immediate visual cues do not counteract delayed auditory feedback effects. This study explores the interplay between sensory information in speech.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Laser Videodisc Technology in the Aural Rehabilitation Setting: Good News for People With Severe and Profound Hearing Impairments.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Feasible Aural Rehabilitation Services for Busy Clinical Settings.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Effects of communication mode on skills of long-term cochlear implant users.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement·2001
    Same author

    The production of English inflectional morphology, speech production and listening performance in children with cochlear implants.

    Ear and hearing·1998
    Same author

    Initial evaluation of an interactive test of sentence gist recognition.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1996
    Same author

    Differences in children's sound production when speaking with a cochlear implant turned on and turned off.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Sibilant differentiation before and after tongue cancer surgery: Acoustics, kinematics and the role of sensorimotor controla).

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    BioNet-A: Ultrasonic echo representation network for target discrimination using active SONAR.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    Empty soft-drink cans and mass-loaded rods: Analogous homework problems from acoustic and mechanical domains.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum: Statistical wave field theory: Anisotropic wave fields under Neumann's boundary condition [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 159(3), 2265-2280 (2026)].

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    On the modification of tip leakage noise sources by porous treatment.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    An educational opportunity: Acoustics in an empty room.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Speech production and perception
    • Human-computer interaction
    • Neuroscience of communication

    Background:

    • Auditory-visual speech interactions are well-documented in perception.
    • The influence of visual information on ongoing speech production remains less understood.
    • Previous research suggests potential cross-modal influences.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of delayed visual feedback on speech production.
    • To determine if immediate visual feedback can mitigate the effects of delayed auditory feedback.
    • To explore the role of visual articulatory information in speech motor control.

    Main Methods:

    • A preliminary study examined delayed visual feedback effects on speech.
    • A main experiment provided immediate visual feedback of articulators.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Delayed auditory feedback was used as a baseline manipulation.
  • Speech errors and production were analyzed in 11 adult speakers.

    • Main Results:

    • Two out of 13 subjects in a preliminary study showed speech errors linked to delayed visual feedback.
    • Immediate visual feedback of articulators did not reduce the impact of delayed auditory feedback on speech production for the 11 speakers in the main experiment.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual feedback's role in speech production is complex and context-dependent.
    • Immediate visual articulatory information may not compensate for auditory processing disruptions.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate cross-modal influences on speech motor control.