Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Revascularization in Ischemic Heart Failure with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Pawel Gasior1, Wojciech Wojakowski1, Elvin Kedhi2,3
1Division of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Insights
Myocardial revascularization in ischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) aims to restore blood flow. Recent studies challenge the benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over optimal medical therapy, emphasizing tailored, multidisciplinary approaches.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of heart failure (HF), particularly heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Ischemic etiology in HFrEF is associated with poorer patient outcomes compared to non-ischemic causes.
- Myocardial revascularization aims to improve outcomes by restoring blood flow to underperfused myocardium, potentially reversing left ventricular hibernation and preventing myocardial infarction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the indications, timing, and type of myocardial revascularization in patients with HFrEF and ischemic etiology.
- To elaborate on the impact of complete revascularization in this patient population.
- To discuss the evolving role of revascularization strategies in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and guidelines regarding myocardial revascularization for ischemic HFrEF.
- Analysis of recent randomized trials comparing revascularization strategies (CABG, PCI) with optimal medical therapy.
- Discussion of the multidisciplinary approach in decision-making for revascularization.
Main Results:
- Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) has historically been the primary revascularization method for multivessel CAD in reduced ejection fraction (EF) patients.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) adoption has increased, but recent trials show no added benefit over optimal medical therapy in severe ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- The decision for revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy requires a tailored strategy, considering the feasibility of complete revascularization.
Conclusions:
- The role of revascularization in ischemic HFrEF is complex and debated, especially following recent trial outcomes.
- A multidisciplinary team approach is essential for personalized treatment strategies in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Achieving complete revascularization remains a consideration, but its feasibility and necessity must be individualized.
Purpose Of Review:
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is estimated to account for over 60% of heart failure (HF) patients and is associated with worse outcomes than a non-ischemic etiology. In patients with ischemic HF, myocardial revascularization has multiple mechanisms of action based on the concept that blood flow restoration of viable but underperfused myocardium might reverse the hibernation of the left ventricle and prevent future spontaneous myocardial infarction, which could potentially improve patients' outcomes. Here, we aim to elaborate on indications, timing, type, and impact of completeness of revascularization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and ischemic etiology.
Recent Findings:
For decades, coronary artery bypass graft surgery has been the pilar of revascularization in patents with multivessel CAD and reduced EF. Recent development in the interventional field led to overall increase of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) adoption in treatment of ischemic HFrEF. However, recently published randomized study demonstrated no added benefit of PCI over optimal medical therapy in patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy challenging the beneficial role of revascularization in this setting. Since the decision on revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy frequently cannot be made based strictly on guidelines, tailored treatment strategy should be mandated with the essential role of multidisciplinary approach. These decisions should be based on capability to achieve complete revascularization, with the consideration that in certain situations it may not be accomplished.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

