Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Safety and efficacy of using Judkins left 3.5 guiding catheters for transradial right coronary artery intervention
1Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China. 710887707@qq.com.
Insights
The Judkins left (JL) 3.5 guiding catheter is safe and effective for transradial right coronary artery (RCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), comparable to other catheters. Factors like heart function, chronic total occlusion (CTO), and tortuosity influence intervention success with JL 3.5.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access Techniques
- Coronary Artery Disease Management
Background:
- Limited data exists on the Judkins left (JL) 3.5 guiding catheter for routine transradial right coronary artery (RCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Assessing the safety and efficacy of the JL 3.5 catheter in this context is crucial for optimizing PCI procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the safety and efficacy of the JL 3.5 guiding catheter for transradial RCA PCI.
- To compare the outcomes of using JL 3.5 versus other routine guiding catheters (GCs) for RCA PCI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 311 patients undergoing transradial RCA PCI.
- Comparison between the JL 3.5 group (n=175) and a routine GC group (n=136) including Judkins right (JR) 4.0 and Amplatz (left) catheters.
- Logistic multivariable analysis to identify factors associated with PCI success, complications, and need for extra support.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in in-hospital complications, need for extra support, or success rates were observed between the JL 3.5 and routine GC groups.
- Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) was negatively associated with intervention success and positively with extra support.
- Vessel tortuosity was associated with the need for extra support.
- In the JL 3.5 group, left ventricular ejection fraction, CTO, and tortuosity were independently associated with intervention success.
Conclusions:
- The JL 3.5 guiding catheter demonstrates comparable safety and efficacy to JR 4.0 and Amplatz (left) catheters for transradial RCA PCI.
- Consideration of patient factors including heart function, CTO, and vessel tortuosity is important when utilizing the JL 3.5 catheter for RCA PCI.
Objective:
There is limited data about the use of a Judkins left (JL) 3.5 guiding catheter for routine transradial right coronary artery (RCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study investigated the safety and efficacy of JL3.5 for RCA PCI.
Patients And Methods:
Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent transradial RCA PCI between November 2019 and November 2020 at the Second Hospital of Shandong University were included. The study retrospectively compared JL 3.5 vs. other routine guiding catheters (GCs), including Judkins right (JR) 4.0 and Amplatz (left). Logistic multivariable analysis was used to analyze the factors associated with transradial RCA PCI success rate, in-hospital complications, and extra support.
Results:
The study included 311 patients: 136 in the routine GC group and 175 in the JL 3.5 group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding in-hospital complications, extra support technics, or success. The multivariable analyses showed that coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) was negatively associated with intervention success (OR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.016-0.248, p < 0.001) but positively with extra support (OR = 8.74, 95% CI: 1.518-50.293, p = 0.015). Tortuosity was associated with extra support (OR = 16.50, 95% CI: 3.324-81.589, p = 0.001). In the JL 3.5 group, the left ventricular ejection fraction (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.20, p = 0.006), CTO (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.008-0.515, p = 0.009), and tortuosity (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.03-0.95, p = 0.043) were independently associated with intervention success.
Conclusions:
JL 3.5 appears to be as safe and effective as the JR 4.0 and Amplatz (left) catheters for RCA PCI. When using the JL 3.5 catheter for RCA PCI, heart function, CTO, and tortuosity should be considered.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

