Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

751
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
751
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

571
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
571
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.2K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.2K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

616
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
616
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

23.5K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
23.5K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

102
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
102

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generalization of long-range machine learning potentials in complex chemical spaces.

Digital discovery·2026
Same author

Morphology-Aware Peptide Discovery via Masked Conditional Generative Modeling.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Mapping Still Matters: Coarse-Graining with Machine Learning Potentials.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Achieving all-atom molecular dynamics accuracy from the Poisson-Boltzmann method through machine learning.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Enhanced Sampling for Efficient Learning of Coarse-Grained Machine Learning Potentials.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

chemtrain-deploy: A Parallel and Scalable Framework for Machine Learning Potentials in Million-Atom MD Simulations.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy
11:15

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy

Published on: June 27, 2013

33.8K

Scalable Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Network Potentials: Promise and Pitfalls.

Stephan Thaler1, Gregor Doehner1, Julija Zavadlav1,2

  • 1Professorship of Multiscale Modeling of Fluid Materials, Department of Engineering Physics and Computation, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching near Munich, Germany.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|April 4, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian uncertainty quantification (UQ) for neural network potentials in molecular dynamics (MD) is now feasible using stochastic gradient MCMC (SG-MCMC). This scalable method provides reliable uncertainty estimates for MD simulations, crucial for practical applications.

More Related Videos

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.4K
Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy
11:15

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy

Published on: June 27, 2013

33.8K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.4K
Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Machine learning in materials science
  • Statistical physics

Background:

  • Neural network (NN) potentials offer computational efficiency for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.
  • NN potentials can produce inaccurate predictions when used outside their training data domains.
  • Accurate uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for reliable NN potential-based MD simulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the efficacy of scalable Bayesian UQ for NN potentials using stochastic gradient MCMC (SG-MCMC).
  • To assess the impact of training data size and multiple Markov chains on UQ reliability.
  • To compare SG-MCMC with the Deep Ensemble method for UQ in MD.

Main Methods:

  • Training graph NN potentials for coarse-grained liquid water and alanine dipeptide systems.
  • Applying SG-MCMC for Bayesian UQ of NN potentials.
  • Investigating the effect of cold posteriors on training data requirements.
  • Utilizing multiple Markov chains for robust UQ.
  • Comparing SG-MCMC with the Deep Ensemble method.

Main Results:

  • SG-MCMC provides reliable uncertainty estimates for MD observables.
  • Cold posteriors can decrease the necessary training data size for UQ.
  • Multiple Markov chains are required for dependable UQ.
  • SG-MCMC and Deep Ensemble methods show comparable performance in capturing aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
  • Neither method reliably captures systematic uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Scalable Bayesian UQ via SG-MCMC is a viable approach for NN potentials in MD.
  • Careful modeling is needed to minimize systematic uncertainty for accurate credible intervals.
  • This work advances trustworthy NN potential-based MD simulations for practical decision-making.