Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Utilisation of total hip arthroplasty in the United States by settlement type: is there equity of access?

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2026
Same author

Contemporary bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty implants demonstrate favorable survivorship: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1576 knees.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2026
Same author

What Are the Substantial Clinical Benefit Thresholds for KOOS Pain, Physical Function, and Joint Replacement Scores After Primary TKA?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same author

Preoperative NarxCare overdose risk scores greater than 100 are associated with worse PROMs improvements and dissatisfaction after primary THA.

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2026
Same author

Differences Between Inpatient and Outpatient Medicare Total Knee Arthroplasty: Substantial Clinical Benefit Thresholds on Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

1-year patient-reported outcomes in patients with a documented GLP-1 agonist prescription history prior to total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2026
Same journal

The Algorithm Is Already Scrubbed in and Why Orthopaedic Surgeons Must Lead, Not Follow, the AI Revolution: Commentary on: "Artificial Intelligence in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Primer on Current Applications, Algorithms, and Future".

JBJS reviews·2026
Same journal

Beyond the Screw: Commentary on an article by Megna Panchbhavi et al.: "Beyond the Screw: Mapping the Evidence Landscape of Modern Syndesmotic Fixation".

JBJS reviews·2026
Same journal

Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation-Based Assessments in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Scoping Review.

JBJS reviews·2026
Same journal

The Interplay of Diabetes, Glucose Variability, and Antidiabetic Therapy in Preventing Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Review.

JBJS reviews·2026
Same journal

How Studying Thresholds Can Harm Health: Commentary on: "Loss of Reduction Following Nonoperative Management for Distal Radius Fractures: A Prognostic Factor Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".

JBJS reviews·2026
Same journal

Clinically Significant Changes in Global Cervical Range of Motion Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.

JBJS reviews·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 4, 2025

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K

Acetabular Component Removal Systems.

Innocent Njoku1, Peter Surace, Nicolas S Piuzzi

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

JBJS Reviews
|April 4, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Acetabular revision surgery is increasingly needed due to rising total hip arthroplasty rates. Advances focus on preserving bone stock during acetabular component removal for stable fixation and hip center restoration.

More Related Videos

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
09:31

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

11.8K
A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy
06:16

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy

Published on: May 1, 2020

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 4, 2025

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
09:31

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

11.8K
A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy
06:16

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy

Published on: May 1, 2020

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures are increasing.
  • Acetabular revision surgery demand is rising in parallel.
  • Acetabular component failure necessitates revision, with treatment dictated by patient factors and bone loss.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review technological advancements in acetabular cup removal for revision total hip arthroplasty.
  • To highlight methods for preserving host bone stock during revision procedures.
  • To discuss achieving stable fixation and restoring hip center in acetabular revision.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on acetabular revision techniques.
  • Discussion of technological innovations in acetabular component removal.
  • Analysis of factors influencing treatment decisions in acetabular revision.

Main Results:

  • Technological progress enables less invasive acetabular cup removal.
  • Preservation of host bone stock is a key consideration in revision THA.
  • Successful acetabular revision aims for stable fixation and anatomical hip center restoration.

Conclusions:

  • Acetabular revision surgery is a growing field requiring specialized techniques.
  • Advances in removal systems improve bone preservation and surgical outcomes.
  • Restoring hip biomechanics through stable fixation is paramount in acetabular revision.