Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

07:39
Determination of the Excitation and Coupling Rates Between Light Emitters and Surface Plasmon Polaritons
Published on: July 21, 2018
6.8K
Surface plasmon enhanced fluorescence: self-consistent classical treatment in the quasi-static limit
1Department of Physics, Louisiana Tech University, PO Box 10348, Ruston, LA 71272, United States of America.
Methods and Applications in Fluorescence
|April 4, 2023
Summary
We developed a theory for surface-enhanced fluorescence (SEF) near nanoparticles. It shows optimal enhancement at intermediate distances, with quenching at shorter distances due to surface plasmons (SP).
Area of Science:
- Optics and Photonics
- Materials Science
- Physical Chemistry
Background:
- Enhanced molecular emission near interfaces is crucial for physical and biological applications.
- Classical electromagnetism provides a framework for understanding these phenomena.
- Dielectric and metallic interfaces, particularly core-shell nanoparticles, influence light-matter interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an exact, self-consistent analytical theory for surface-enhanced fluorescence (SEF).
- To investigate the influence of excitation/fluorescence frequencies and emitter-nanoparticle distance on SEF.
- To determine optimal configurations for SEF using core-shell nanoparticles.
Main Methods:
- Classical electromagnetism treatment.
- Development of a self-consistent analytical theory for SEF.
- Analysis of emitter proximity to core-shell metal-dielectric nanoparticles.
Main Results:
- The theory predicts fluorescence enhancement at intermediate emitter-nanoparticle distances.
- Emission quenching into non-radiative surface plasmon (SP) modes dominates at short distances.
- Optimal emission enhancement conditions were determined for two core-shell configurations.
- The model shows good agreement with published experimental data.
Conclusions:
- The developed theory accurately models surface-enhanced fluorescence (SEF) near core-shell nanoparticles.
- The findings provide insights into optimizing SEF for spectroscopic applications.
- The model is applicable to analyzing and enhancing various SP-enhanced fluorescence spectroscopy techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy
7.1K
Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRFM) provides a better resolution than conventional fluorescence microscopy by reducing the point spread function (PSF). PSF is the light intensity distribution from a point that causes it to appear blurred. Due to PSF, each fluorescing point appears bigger than its actual size, and it is the PSF interference of nearby fluorophores that causes the blurred image. Various approaches to achieving higher resolution through SRFM have recently been...
7.1K
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
13.5K
Confocal microscopy is an advanced microscopic technique. The prime advantage of the confocal microscope over other microscopy techniques is its ability to block the out-of-focus light from the illuminated samples using pinholes. It is widely used with fluorescence optics to obtain high-resolution, sharp contrast images. Unlike optical microscopes, confocal microscopes use a focused beam of light laser to scan the entire sample surface at different z-planes. These microscopes are, therefore,...
13.5K
Photoelectric Effect
29.9K
When light of a particular wavelength strikes a metal surface, electrons are emitted. This is called the photoelectric effect. The minimum frequency of light that can cause such emission of electrons is called the threshold frequency, which is specific to the metal. Light with a frequency lower than the threshold frequency, even if it is of high intensity, cannot initiate the emission of electrons. However, when the frequency is higher than the threshold value, the number of electrons ejected...
29.9K

