Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating individual hospital quality through outcome statistics.

H S Luft, S S Hunt

    JAMA
    |May 23, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Routinely collected hospital data can reveal performance trends, but small patient numbers hinder identifying individual physician or hospital outcomes. More data is needed for reliable performance assessments.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Better for whom? Policy implications of acting on the relation between volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2001
    Same author

    Context and community.

    Health services research·2001
    Same author

    Managed care in transition.

    The New England journal of medicine·2001
    Same author

    Assessing the relationship between quality of care and the characteristics of health care organizations.

    Medical care research and review : MCRR·2000
    Same author

    A reply to Sullivan's reanalysis of managed care plan performance since 1980.

    American journal of public health·2000
    Same author

    Pharmacoeconomic analyses: making them transparent, making them credible.

    JAMA·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare analytics
    • Clinical quality measurement
    • Hospital performance evaluation

    Background:

    • Hospital abstracting services and peer review organizations routinely collect case abstract data.
    • These data are valuable for analyzing hospital performance patterns and identifying correlations between procedure volume and patient outcomes.
    • Routinely collected data offer a potential method for identifying high-performing or low-performing hospitals and physicians.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the utility of routinely collected hospital data for identifying individual physician and hospital performance.
    • To illustrate the challenges in confidently identifying individual performers due to small patient numbers and low adverse event rates.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of routinely collected case abstract data.
    • Utilizing recent data from cardiac catheterization patients as a case study.
    • Statistical assessment of performance identification based on patient volume and outcome rates.

    Main Results:

    • Routinely collected data demonstrate an inverse relationship between procedure volume and patient outcomes across hospitals.
    • Identifying individual hospitals or physicians with significantly good or poor outcomes is challenging.
    • Small patient cohorts and low rates of adverse events limit the statistical confidence in performance assessments.

    Conclusions:

    • While valuable for broad performance analysis, routinely collected data have limitations for pinpointing individual provider performance.
    • Further methodological advancements are required to reliably identify outliers in healthcare quality using existing data sources.
    • Cardiac catheterization data exemplify the difficulties in attributing performance to specific providers based on current data collection practices.

    Related Experiment Videos