Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

151
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
151
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.0K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

164
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
164
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

237
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
237

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Covariate Adjustment in Basket Trials Borrowing Information Across Subgroups.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Clinical Trial Simulation: Planning With the OCTAVE Framework, Implementation and Validation Principles.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

A burn-in(g) question: How long should an initial equal randomization stage be before Bayesian response-adaptive randomization?

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Practical guidance for conducting high-quality and rapid interim analyses in adaptive clinical trials.

BMC medicine·2025
Same author

Revolutionizing IBD Clinical Trials with Bayesian Approaches.

Inflammatory bowel diseases·2025
Same author

Confidence Intervals for Adaptive Trial Designs II: Case Study and Practical Guidance.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Joint analysis of longitudinal and recurrent event data: A functional regression approach with autoregressive frailty.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Familywise error rate control for block response-adaptive randomization.

Ekkehard Glimm1,2, David S Robertson3

  • 1Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|April 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials can be improved with a new method that simplifies calculations and ensures positive data weights. This approach enhances statistical power while maintaining error rate control for adaptive trial designs.

Keywords:
Conditional invariance principlemultiple testingpowertype I error rate

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

630
Wild-type Blocking PCR Combined with Direct Sequencing as a Highly Sensitive Method for Detection of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutations
10:41

Wild-type Blocking PCR Combined with Direct Sequencing as a Highly Sensitive Method for Detection of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutations

Published on: March 29, 2017

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

630
Wild-type Blocking PCR Combined with Direct Sequencing as a Highly Sensitive Method for Detection of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutations
10:41

Wild-type Blocking PCR Combined with Direct Sequencing as a Highly Sensitive Method for Detection of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutations

Published on: March 29, 2017

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methodology

Background:

  • Response-adaptive randomization adjusts treatment allocation probabilities based on accumulating data.
  • A key concern is maintaining statistical validity, particularly controlling the type I error rate.
  • Previous work by Robertson and Wason (2019) offered familywise error rate control via re-weighted z-tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a conceptually simpler and improved method for response-adaptive randomization in block designs.
  • To ensure non-negative weights for data blocks in the adjusted test statistics.
  • To enhance statistical power in adaptive clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Modification of the Robertson and Wason (2019) re-weighting methodology for block-randomized trials.
  • Development of an adjusted test statistic that guarantees non-negative block contributions.
  • Theoretical analysis and simulation to evaluate error control and power.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method guarantees non-negative weights for each data block.
  • The modified approach maintains familywise error rate control.
  • Demonstrated potential for substantial power advantages compared to existing methods.

Conclusions:

  • The improved method offers a simpler, more robust approach to response-adaptive randomization in block designs.
  • This technique addresses regulatory concerns regarding error rate control.
  • The method enhances statistical efficiency and power in adaptive clinical trials.