Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

04:25
Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
Published on: December 15, 2023
2.5K
Evaluation of Spatial Attentive Deep Learning for Automatic Placental Segmentation on Longitudinal MRI
Yongkai Liu1,2, Fatemeh Zabihollahy1, Ran Yan1,3
1Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI
|April 6, 2023
Summary
This study introduces a spatial attentive deep learning method (SADL) for automated placental MRI segmentation. SADL demonstrates high performance across different gestational ages, improving prediction of pregnancy outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
- Obstetrics
Background:
- Automated placental segmentation using MRI in early pregnancy aids in predicting placental function and pregnancy outcomes.
- Segmentation methods effective at one gestational age may not generalize to others.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a spatial attentive deep learning method (SADL) for automated placental segmentation on longitudinal placental MRI scans.
- To assess the performance of SADL across different gestational ages.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, single-center study included 154 pregnant women scanned at 14-18 and 19-24 weeks of gestation.
- T2-weighted T2-HASTE MRI sequences were used.
- Manual segmentation by a clinical fellow served as the reference standard.
- Spatial attentive deep learning (SADL) and U-Net were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).
Main Results:
- SADL achieved significantly higher average DSCs (0.83 ± 0.06 and 0.84 ± 0.05) compared to U-Net (0.77 ± 0.08 and 0.76 ± 0.10) at both gestational age ranges.
- Volume measurement differences between SADL and manual segmentation were within 95% limits of agreement for 90.4% of scans.
Conclusions:
- Spatial attentive deep learning (SADL) effectively performs automated placental segmentation on MRI scans.
- The SADL method shows high performance across two different gestational ages, supporting its utility in clinical practice.

