Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
Published on: April 19, 2024
Infant feeding method and special educational need in 191,745 Scottish schoolchildren: A national, population cohort
Lisa J Adams1, Jill P Pell1, Daniel F Mackay1
1School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Insights
Breastfeeding and mixed feeding in infants are linked to a lower risk of special educational needs (SEN). Even non-exclusive breastfeeding shows benefits, highlighting the importance of infant feeding support.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Developmental Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Special educational needs (SEN) are increasingly identified in schoolchildren.
- Infant breastfeeding is associated with reduced risks of childhood physical and mental health issues.
- This study explores the link between infant feeding methods and the risk of SEN.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between infant feeding methods (formula, exclusive breastfeeding, mixed feeding) and the risk of all-cause and cause-specific SEN.
- To analyze the association between infant feeding and specific SEN categories, including learning disabilities, learning difficulties, communication problems, social-emotional-behavioral difficulties, sensory impairments, physical motor disabilities, and physical health conditions.
Main Methods:
- A population cohort of Scottish schoolchildren born from 2004 onwards was constructed by linking health and education databases.
- Generalized estimating equation models were used to analyze associations between infant feeding at 6-8 weeks and SEN, adjusting for sociodemographic and maternity factors.
- Data from 191,745 children were analyzed, with 12.1% requiring SEN.
Main Results:
- Compared to formula feeding, both mixed feeding (OR 0.90) and exclusive breastfeeding (OR 0.78) were associated with decreased all-cause SEN.
- Exclusive breastfeeding showed significant reductions in SEN related to learning disabilities, learning difficulties, communication problems, social-emotional-behavioral difficulties, sensory impairments, and physical motor disabilities.
- No significant associations were found between feeding method and mental health conditions or autism.
Conclusions:
- Both breastfeeding and mixed feeding at 6-8 weeks are linked to a lower risk of all-cause SEN and specific learning-related SEN.
- Evidence suggests that even shorter durations of non-exclusive breastfeeding can be beneficial in reducing the development of SEN.
- Findings reinforce the importance of breastfeeding education and support for maternal and child health outcomes.
Background:
While special educational needs (SEN) are increasingly recorded among schoolchildren, infant breastfeeding has been associated with reduced incidence of childhood physical and mental health problems. This study investigated relationships between infant feeding method and risk of all-cause and cause-specific SEN.
Methods And Findings:
A population cohort of schoolchildren in Scotland was constructed by linking together health (maternity, birth, and health visitor records) and education (annual school pupil census) databases. Inclusion was restricted to singleton children, born in Scotland from 2004 onwards with available breastfeeding data and who attended local authority mainstream or special schools between 2009 and 2013. Generalised estimating equation models with a binomial distribution and logit link function investigated associations between infant feeding method at 6 to 8 weeks and all-cause and cause-specific SEN, adjusting for sociodemographic and maternity factors. Of 191,745 children meeting inclusion criteria, 126,907 (66.2%) were formula-fed, 48,473 (25.3%) exclusively breastfed, and 16,365 (8.5%) mixed-fed. Overall, 23,141 (12.1%) children required SEN. Compared with formula feeding, mixed feeding and exclusive breastfeeding, respectively, were associated with decreased all-cause SEN (OR 0.90, 95% CI [0.84,0.95], p < 0.001 and 0.78, [0.75,0.82], p < 0.001), and SEN attributed to learning disabilities (0.75, [0.65,0.87], p < 0.001 and 0.66, [0.59,0.74], p < 0.001), and learning difficulties (0.85, [0.77,0.94], p = 0.001 and 0.75, [0.70,0.81], p < 0.001). Compared with formula feeding, exclusively breastfed children had less communication problems (0.81, [0.74,0.88], p = 0.001), social-emotional-behavioural difficulties (0.77, [0.70,0.84], p = 0.001), sensory impairments (0.79, [0.65,0.95], p = 0.01), physical motor disabilities (0.78, [0.66,0.91], p = 0.002), and physical health conditions (0.74, [0.63,0.87], p = 0.01). There were no significant associations for mixed-fed children (communication problems (0.94, [0.83,1.06], p = 0.312), social-emotional-behavioural difficulties (0.96, [0.85,1.09], p = 0.541), sensory impairments (1.07, [0.84,1.37], p = 0.579), physical motor disabilities (0.97, [0.78,1.19], p = 0.754), and physical health conditions (0.93, [0.74,1.16], p = 0.504)). Feeding method was not significantly associated with mental health conditions (exclusive 0.58 [0.33,1.03], p = 0.061 and mixed 0.74 [0.36,1.53], p = 0.421) or autism (exclusive 0.88 [0.77,1.01], p = 0.074 and mixed 1.01 [0.84,1.22], p = 0.903). Our study was limited since only 6- to 8-week feeding method was available precluding differentiation between never-breastfed infants and those who stopped breastfeeding before 6 weeks. Additionally, we had no data on maternal and paternal factors such as education level, IQ, employment status, race/ethnicity, or mental and physical health.
Conclusions:
In this study, we observed that both breastfeeding and mixed feeding at 6 to 8 weeks were associated with lower risk of all-cause SEN, and SEN attributed to learning disabilities and learning difficulty. Many women struggle to exclusively breastfeed for the full 6 months recommended by WHO; however, this study provides evidence that a shorter duration of nonexclusive breastfeeding could nonetheless be beneficial with regard to the development of SEN. Our findings augment the existing evidence base concerning the advantages of breastfeeding and reinforce the importance of breastfeeding education and support.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...

