Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 4, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

14.6K

External Validation of a Prediction Model for External Cephalic Version Success.

Thomas P Kishkovich1, Mackenzie N Naert, Fowsia Warsame

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
|April 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hospital-Level Variation in Antenatal Corticosteroids for Late Preterm Births.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of obstetrics residents towards cesarean delivery-sparing procedures.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2026
Same author

Gestational Glucose Intolerance and the Risk of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Placental pathology and weight following Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) with or without ovarian stimulation (OS).

Placenta·2026
Same author

Antenatal Steroid Exposure among Late Preterm Births Following Updated Clinical Guidance.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

New Editor Selected for Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

The Political Determinants of Obstetric Prescribing.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Adverse Maternal Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Milestones in Motion: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Ebola Virus in Pregnancy.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

A Quality-Improvement Study Evaluating Three Postpartum Prophylactic Oxytocin Rates and Blood Loss After Vaginal Birth.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Climate Change on Obstetric and Gynecologic Health.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
See all related articles

This study validated a prediction model for external cephalic version (ECV) success. The model proved generalizable, showing similar performance across different institutions and patient populations.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Background:

  • External cephalic version (ECV) success is influenced by various maternal and fetal factors.
  • A previous model predicted ECV success using body mass index, parity, placental location, and fetal presentation.

Discussion:

  • This study externally validated a previously developed ECV success prediction model.
  • The validation cohort demonstrated similar model performance (AUROC 0.70) compared to the derivation cohort (AUROC 0.67).
  • Despite significant differences in patient populations and clinical practices (e.g., neuraxial anesthesia rates), the model's generalizability was supported.

Key Insights:

  • The external validation confirmed the generalizability of the ECV success prediction model across different institutions.
  • The model's predictive accuracy remained consistent, indicating its robustness.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 4, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

14.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.2K
  • The study highlights the importance of validated predictive tools in clinical decision-making for ECV.

    • Outlook:

    • Further prospective studies could refine the model with additional variables.
    • Implementation of this validated model in clinical practice may aid in patient counseling and procedural planning.
    • Continued research into factors influencing ECV success can enhance obstetric care for breech presentations.