Abortion Access and Medically Complex Pregnancies Before and After Texas Senate Bill 8
Whitney Arey1, Klaira Lerma, Emma Carpenter
1Texas Policy Evaluation Project and the Population Research Center, the Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, the Steve Hicks School of Social Work, and the Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, the Pegasus Health Justice Center, Dallas, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas.
Texas healthcare professionals faced challenges providing abortion care for medically complex pregnancies due to restrictions. Senate Bill 8 (SB8) further limited options, impacting patient health and shared decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Public Health Policy
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Medically complex pregnancies pose significant health risks to pregnant individuals.
- Navigating abortion restrictions presents challenges for healthcare providers and patients.
- Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8) significantly altered abortion access in the state.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate how Texas healthcare professionals manage abortion restrictions for patients with medically complex pregnancies.
- To understand the impact of Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8) on clinical practice and patient care.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative in-depth interviews with 50 healthcare professionals in Texas (25 before and 25 after SB8 implementation).
- Participants included maternal-fetal medicine specialists, obstetrician-gynecologists, abortion care providers, and genetic counselors.
- Inductive and deductive qualitative analysis to identify practice changes.
Main Results:
- Counseling on pregnancy risks and outcomes was curtailed after SB8 implementation.
- Narrower criteria for medically necessary abortions and administrative hurdles delayed care.
- Patients with limited resources often continued pregnancies, increasing morbidity risks.
- Institutional policies and SB8 constrained evidence-based abortion care, narrowing options.
Conclusions:
- Abortion restrictions, particularly SB8, constrained Texas healthcare professionals' ability to provide evidence-based care for medically complex pregnancies.
- These restrictions limit shared decision-making, compromise patient care, and endanger pregnant individuals' health.
- The findings highlight the critical need to consider the impact of legislation on patient outcomes in complex pregnancies.
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care I
Teratogenicity
Standards of Care II
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...


