Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Investigation into Deep Breathing through Measurement of Ventilatory Parameters and Observation of Breathing Patterns
Published on: September 16, 2019
Validating the Breathing Vigilance Questionnaire for use in dysfunctional breathing
Jennifer Steinmann1,2,3, Adam Lewis2,4,3, Toby J Ellmers5,6
1Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Background:
Dysfunctional breathing is common among people with and without primary respiratory pathology. While anxiety can contribute to dysfunctional breathing, the underpinning mechanism is unclear. One explanation is that anxiety induces conscious, vigilant monitoring of breathing, disrupting "automatic" breathing mechanics. We validated a new tool that quantifies such breathing-related "vigilance": the Breathing Vigilance Questionnaire (Breathe-VQ).
Methods:
323 healthy adults (mean (range) age 27.3 (18-71) years; 161 males) were analysed. We developed an initial Breathe-VQ (11 items, 1-5 Likert scale) based on the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Scale, using feedback from the target population and clinicians. At baseline, participants completed the Breathe-VQ, Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form 2 and Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale (assessing general conscious processing). 83 people repeated the Breathe-VQ 3 weeks later.
Results:
Five items were removed based on item-level analysis. The resulting six-item Breathe-VQ questionnaire (score range 6-30) has excellent internal (α=0.892) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation 0.810), a minimal detectable change of 6.5 and no floor/ceiling effects. Validity was evidenced by significant positive correlations with trait anxiety and conscious processing scores (r=0.35-0.46). Participants at high risk of having dysfunctional breathing (NQ >23; n=76) had significantly higher Breathe-VQ score (mean±sd 19.1±5.0) than low-risk peers (n=225; mean±sd 13.8±5.4; p<0.001). In this "high risk of dysfunctional breathing" group, Breathe-VQ and NQ scores were significantly associated (p=0.005), even when controlling for risk factors (e.g. trait anxiety).
Conclusions:
The Breathe-VQ is a valid and reliable tool to measure breathing vigilance. High breathing vigilance may contribute to dysfunctional breathing and could represent a therapeutic target. Further research is warranted to test Breathe-VQ's prognostic value and assess intervention effects.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I
Alterations in Respiration II
In Biot's breathing, the respiratory rate and depth are irregular, alternating between periods of deep gasping and apnea. Common causes...

