Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
Published on: February 16, 2022
Cohort Event Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines in Seven European Countries: Pooled Results on
Monika Raethke1, Florence van Hunsel2, Nicolas H Thurin3
1Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. m.raethke@lareb.nl.
Insights
This study monitored COVID-19 vaccine safety across Europe. Most reported reactions were common and mild, with serious events and adverse events of special interest being rare.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance
- Vaccine Safety
- Public Health
Background:
- COVID-19 vaccines underwent rapid authorization, necessitating robust post-marketing safety surveillance.
- A multi-national European collaboration was formed to prospectively monitor the benefit-risk profile of COVID-19 vaccines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in a large, multi-national European cohort.
- To collect and analyze self-reported adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort event monitoring study involving web-based surveys in seven European countries.
- Data collection included baseline and follow-up questionnaires on self-reported adverse reactions for up to one year.
- Analysis stratified adverse reactions by type, severity, and vaccine brand.
Main Results:
- 117,791 participants were included, with the majority from Germany and the Netherlands.
- AstraZeneca was the most common first-dose vaccine (75.9%), followed by BioNTech/Pfizer (12.4%), Moderna (9.6%), and Janssen (2.1%).
- Common reactions included fatigue, headache, and injection-site pain; serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest were infrequent (0.1-0.2%).
Conclusions:
- COVID-19 vaccines demonstrated a high frequency of expected systemic and local reactions, indicative of immunogenicity.
- Serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest were uncommon, aligning with product label information.
- The study confirmed the feasibility of large-scale, multi-national cohort event monitoring for novel vaccine safety assessment.
Introduction:
COVID-19 vaccines were rapidly authorised, thus requiring intense post-marketing re-evaluation of their benefit-risk profile. A multi-national European collaboration was established with the aim to prospectively monitor safety of the COVID-19 vaccines through web-based survey of vaccinees.
Methods:
A prospective cohort event monitoring study was conducted with primary consented data collection in seven European countries. Through the web applications, participants received and completed baseline and up to six follow-up questionnaires on self-reported adverse reactions for at least 6 months following the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (Netherlands, France, Belgium, UK, Italy) and baseline and up to ten follow-up questionnaires for one year in Germany and Croatia. Rates of adverse reactions have been described by type (solicited, non-solicited; serious/non-serious; and adverse events of special interest) and stratified by vaccine brand. We calculated the frequency of adverse reaction after dose 1 and prior to dose 2 among all vaccinees who completed at least one follow-up questionnaire.
Results:
Overall, 117,791 participants were included and completed the first questionnaire in addition to the baseline: 88,196 (74.9%) from Germany, 27,588 (23.4%) from Netherlands, 984 (0.8%) from France, 570 (0.5%) from Italy, 326 (0.3%) from Croatia, 89 (0.1%) from the UK and 38 (0.03%) from Belgium. There were 89,377 (75.9%) respondents who had received AstraZeneca vaccines, 14,658 (12.4%) BioNTech/Pfizer, 11,266 (9.6%) Moderna and 2490 (2.1%) Janssen vaccines as a first dose. Median age category was 40-49 years for all vaccines except for Pfizer where median age was 70-79 years. Most vaccinees were female with a female-to-male ratio of 1.34, 1.96 and 2.50 for AstraZeneca, Moderna and Janssen, respectively. BioNtech/Pfizer had slightly more men with a ratio of 0.82. Fatigue and headache were the most commonly reported solicited systemic adverse reactions and injection-site pain was the most common solicited local reaction. The rates of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were 0.1-0.2% across all vaccine brands.
Conclusion:
This large-scale prospective study of COVID-19 vaccine recipients showed, for all the studied vaccines, a high frequency of systemic reactions, related to the immunogenic response, and local reactions at the injection site, while serious reactions or AESIs were uncommon, consistent with those reported on product labels. This study demonstrated the feasibility of setting up and conducting cohort event monitoring across multiple European countries to collect safety data on novel vaccines that are rolled out at scale in populations which may not have been included in pivotal trials.
More Related Videos
06:37Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
09:03Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development
Published on: June 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Allergic Drug Reactions
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Allergic Reactions
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy